南大，我想我还会回来的。

walayilansusu

今天去南大考得GMAT，大概7点半去的，半个人影也没有，说上去了解一下考场，看门的不让去，就坐在门口吹风....八个考生大概将近八点到齐，八点就开考了，就开始check in，一切结束后本来应该开始了，结果系统出了问题，所有人都登陆不了，工作人员进进出出，输了好几遍指令都不行。。。。。直到八点半才成功，我是第一次考，本来就心慌，结果更乱了.....其实结果也想好了，估计也是五星级惨烈，很符合我所想的，所有那些客观因素都不是问题，主观自己就没有做到位，分数没有颜面在各种牛人面前说了。



下面把我能想起来的阅读和写作题目说一下，写作AA是那个人们很注意健康，更喜欢吃有机食物因为里面没有化学成分和杀虫剂，然后一个manager，就说了要在好像三家fitness gyms里开organic grocery section,这样一定能赚更多的利润。AI是说fossil fuels are vital and limited, so the international agreements should be adopted by all the countries to reduce the dependence on the resources.阅读说了那个咖啡那个，还有一个是说英国十八世纪工业革命女性工作的问题，说并没有因为工业革命而是女性的工作收益，还是domestic为主，并且与男性相比，男性的工作还是更占优势，好像是这样的....还有一篇说两种生物共生的的现象，把生物名字忘了...有个单词不认识，说这两种生物的共生与其他的共生不一样，其他的共生比如两方都受益，或者一方建立在另一方牺牲的前提下，而这种好像是一方收益，一方无害但不受益。。。。还有一篇是将英国的retailing与欧洲其他国家和美国的不同之处以及原因。。。阅读都好长啊，好长好长，只有一篇中等长，剩下都很长，唉，自己水平不行，所以才觉得难....
其他题目慢慢回忆，记性实在太差。。。数学一下子想不起太多，怎么可以对数字如此不敏感。。。。。回忆起来再补上。。。。


这次没考好，是各方面都不到位，打算改革后再考吧，对于二战，特别想听听各位牛人的建议，这次真的打击惨了，薄弱主要是在读题上，一遇到长难句就发憷，时间太不够，心理素质也不过关，也不知道自己慌什么，一慌越发读不好提。至于下次考成什么样的口号并不重要，重要的是好好反省以及认多多吸取经验教训，希望大家也给一些建议。南大，我想我还会回来的。

airphone

楼主说的工业革命的那篇是下面哪一个版本啊?V3 (V34)
工业革命对妇女工作的影响。比较简单，但因为没时间了所以看得很快~两段，第一段说有俩人认为工业革命对妇女工作一点影响也没有，第二段全在否定这俩学者的观点，作者的态度是全否。
问题1：文章主旨（或者是purpose。我昏了~)：批判俩学者观点  
问题2：下面哪项是这俩学者认为的  
问题3：highlight最后一句表明：好像是选family 啥啥啥的。。
OLD JJ
講两本评价妇女革命的书，着重将第二本。
第一本认为industrialization和family context 对妇女的work decision 没有影响。
第二本书除了比较了18 和19世纪妇女的情况外，还提出了一种新的看问题的方式。说对妇女的评价要基于一个frame reference 。说妇女一方面是lose power 了，比如送小孩、监管学校之类的活都给男人干去了；但是同时在另一方面又gain power 了，比如有了更多的real estate 。文章最后批评第一本书不好，因为没有statistic和analyze
JJ 说的细节没有错，但是主线没有抓住。第二段中的两本书，分别简称“POST“ for Middle class,“STORY” for working class. 是用来证明第一段的MEDIA的。
对不起，我记得不是很清楚，但是JJ 里面的细节是很容易看懂的，对FOCUS的把握可能因人而异。这也就是为什么同样的文章，TESTER写出不同的JJ来。
V2
还一篇是说谁谁谁在一本书里说工业化改变了妇女的work management?，但后来被否定了这个说法，而且family context还在妇女工作决策中占了很重要的地位。且妇女能够参加的工作和程度varied little。但最后一句引用那书里的话没看懂...有一题主旨题，还有问可以推出下列那个是对的云云。
PREP 原文:
Traditionalsocial science models of class groups in the United States are based on economic status and assume that women's economic status derives from association with men, typically fathers or husbands, and that women therefore have more compelling common interest with men of their own economic class than with women outside it.  Some feminist social scientists, by contrast, have arguedthat the basic division in American society is instead based on gender, and that the total female population, regardless of economic status, constitutes a distinct class.  Social historian Mary Ryan, for example, has argued that in early-nineteenth-century America the identical legal status of working-class and middle-class free women outweighed the differences between women of these two classes:  marriedwomen, regardless of their family's wealth, did essentially the same unpaid domestic work, and none could own property or vote.  Recently, though,other feminist analysts have questioned this model, examining ways in which the condition of working-class women differs from that of middle-class women aswell as from that of working-class men.  Ann Oakley notes, for example,that the gap between women of different economic classes widened in the latenineteenth century:  most working-class women, who performed wage laboroutside the home, were excluded from the emerging middle-class ideal offemininity centered around domesticity and volunteerism.
Question #16.  189-01  (21999-!-item-!-188;#058&000189-01)
The primary purpose of the passage is to
(A) offer sociohistorical explanations for the cultural differences between menand women in the United States
(B) examine how the economic roles of women in the United States changed duringthe nineteenth century
(C) consider differing views held by social scientists concerning women's class status in the United States
(D) propose a feminist interpretation of class structure in the United States
(E) outline specific distinctions between working-class women and women of theupper and middle classes  

Question #17.  189-03  (22045-!-item-!-188;#058&000189-03)
It can be inferred from the passage that the most recent feminist social science research on women and class seeks to do which of the following?
(A) Introduce a divergent new theory about the relationship between legal status and gender
(B) Illustrate an implicit middle-class bias in earlier feminist models ofclass and gender
(C) Provide evidence for the position that gender matters more than wealth indetermining class status
(D) Remedy perceived inadequacies of both traditional social science models andearlier feminist analyses of class and gender
(E) Challenge the economic definitions of class used by traditional socialscientists  

Question #18.  189-05  (22091-!-item-!-188;#058&000189-05)
Which of the following statements best characterizes the relationship between traditional social science models of class and Ryan's model, as described inthe passage?
(A) Ryan's model differs from the traditional model by making gender, ratherthan economic status, the determinant of women's class status.
(B) The traditional social science model of class differs from Ryan's in itsassumption that women are financially dependent on men.
(C) Ryan's model of class and the traditional social science model both assumethat women work, either within the home or for pay.
(D) The traditional social science model of class differs from Ryan's in that each model focuses on a different period of American history.  
(E) Both Ryan's model of class and the traditional model consider multiplefactors, including wealth, marital status, and enfranchisement, in determiningwomen's status.  答案：CDA

Taylor小熊

读杨鹏长难句、没多少句你就能练出感觉了LZ！呕血推荐！

step`curry

感激楼主

ft228592139

楼主继续加油！ 我也是24号也是在南大考哈！

rachelloli

谢谢楼主……411北京表示鸭梨很大……

天天猜猜天

谢谢楼主

sarah9142

4.24南大一战，希望能顺利~~~

林佑希

楼主，同南大，412考~共努力！~

adie209

感谢楼主！