ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Commentator: The theory of trade retaliation states that countries closed out of any of another country's markets should close some of their own markets to the other country in order to pressure the other country to reopen its markets. If every country acted according to this theory, no country would trade with any other.

The commentator's argument relies on which of the following assumptions?

正确答案: D

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 4800|回复: 11
打印 上一主题 下一主题

求证!关于新东方老师说假设题中取非答案问题。NN们来帮忙啊~

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2012-1-29 08:56:24 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |正序浏览 |阅读模式
先给大家拜晚年了^_^

新东方老师说假设题里先看选项中是否定句的,有否定句的答案一定是否定句中的一个。这个方法到底对不对啊~
那假设题正确的解题步骤应该是怎样的呢~??


这里预祝大家新年里杀鸡的都能大获全胜哈~
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
12#
发表于 2012-5-10 13:56:43 | 只看该作者

找到!

不用麻烦nn们了,我找到了好好研读中……
11#
发表于 2012-5-10 13:48:44 | 只看该作者
大牛们,能不能把连接放出来呢??找的很辛苦……
10#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-2-2 16:07:58 | 只看该作者
逻辑专区置顶的哈~
9#
发表于 2012-2-2 15:56:16 | 只看该作者
可以给我的post的链接吗?谢谢啦~
8#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-2-2 15:41:48 | 只看该作者
谢谢你的耐心哈~我又读了几遍~终于弄明白了,对assumption题也有感觉了~太感谢了~


看了你的post,但还是觉得混淆。感觉取非看是否能削弱原题适用于大部分的题。那什么时候不用削弱呢?如何判断,是从问题里判断还是从原文中??另外,需要填补GAP的题型也可以用取非来完成是么??

不好意思老师,我的问题都比较弱,assumption已经困扰我一个下午了,感觉还是没有理清思路,反而越看越混乱了T T~救救我。。。
-- by 会员 wsyzzydy (2012/1/29 17:10:16)




Then read them again. What are the two types of assumptions? What type of question stem is associated with each? Which method to use for each type to find the correct answer? What is a logic chain.

One afternoon is not enough to understand assumption questions. Spend more time on logic.
-- by 会员 sdcar2010 (2012/1/29 21:58:25)

7#
发表于 2012-1-29 21:58:25 | 只看该作者

看了你的post,但还是觉得混淆。感觉取非看是否能削弱原题适用于大部分的题。那什么时候不用削弱呢?如何判断,是从问题里判断还是从原文中??另外,需要填补GAP的题型也可以用取非来完成是么??

不好意思老师,我的问题都比较弱,assumption已经困扰我一个下午了,感觉还是没有理清思路,反而越看越混乱了T T~救救我。。。
-- by 会员 wsyzzydy (2012/1/29 17:10:16)



Then read them again. What are the two types of assumptions? What type of question stem is associated with each? Which method to use for each type to find the correct answer? What is a logic chain.

One afternoon is not enough to understand assumption questions. Spend more time on logic.
6#
发表于 2012-1-29 21:53:17 | 只看该作者
追问道题
Commentator: The theory of trade retaliation states that countries closed out of any of another country’s markets should close some of their own markets to the other country in order to pressure the other country to reopen its markets. If every country acted according to this theory, no country would trade with any other.
The commentator’s argument relies on which of the following assumptions?
(A) No country actually acts according to the theory of trade retaliation.
(B) No country should block any of its markets to foreign trade.
(C) Trade disputes should be settled by international tribunal.
(D) For any two countries, at least one has some market closed to the other.
(E) Countries close their markets to foreigners to protect domestic producers.

这道题应该如何理解?
-- by 会员 wsyzzydy (2012/1/29 17:33:29)



(D) For any two countries, at least one has some market closed to the other.

Necessary assumption. Use negation.

If you negate this statement, then any two countries has no market closed to the other, what would happen? Nothing! The trade goes on. Therefore this is a necessary assumption that the argument relies on.
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-1-29 17:33:29 | 只看该作者
追问道题
Commentator: The theory of trade retaliation states that countries closed out of any of another country’s markets should close some of their own markets to the other country in order to pressure the other country to reopen its markets. If every country acted according to this theory, no country would trade with any other.
The commentator’s argument relies on which of the following assumptions?
(A) No country actually acts according to the theory of trade retaliation.
(B) No country should block any of its markets to foreign trade.
(C) Trade disputes should be settled by international tribunal.
(D) For any two countries, at least one has some market closed to the other.
(E) Countries close their markets to foreigners to protect domestic producers.

这道题应该如何理解?
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2012-1-29 17:10:16 | 只看该作者
Nonsense.

Read my post. There are two types of assumptions and the negation test only works for one of them.
-- by 会员 sdcar2010 (2012/1/29 12:06:43)





看了你的post,但还是觉得混淆。感觉取非看是否能削弱原题适用于大部分的题。那什么时候不用削弱呢?如何判断,是从问题里判断还是从原文中??另外,需要填补GAP的题型也可以用取非来完成是么??


不好意思老师,我的问题都比较弱,assumption已经困扰我一个下午了,感觉还是没有理清思路,反而越看越混乱了T T~救救我。。。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-6 03:16
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部