- UID
- 779686
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2012-7-11
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
1.
Provinces and states with stringent car safety requirements, including required use of seat belts and annual safety inspections, have on average higher rates of accidents per kilometer driven than do provinces and states with less stringent requirements. Nevertheless, most highway safety experts agree that more stringent requirements do reduce accident rates. Which one of the following, if true, most helps to reconcile the safety experts’ belief with the apparently contrary evidence described above? (A) Annual safety inspections ensure that car tires are replaced before they grow old.
So accident rates should be lower with more stringent requirements than with less stringent requirements. (B) Drivers often become overconfident after their cars have passed a thorough safety inspection.
So the second view should be doubtful. (C) The roads in provinces and states with stringent car safety programs are far more congested and therefore dangerous than in other provinces and states.
Yes, in this case, it points out another factor which can contribute the higher rates of accidents in provinces and states with stringent car safety programs.BA (D) Psychological studies show that drivers who regularly wear seat belts often come to think of themselves as serious drivers, which for a few people discourages reckless driving.
The first view should be questionable. (E) Provinces and states with stringent car safety requirements have, on average, many more kilometers of roads then do other provinces and states.
More kilometers do not make sure average higher rates of accidents per kilometer.
89. (31236-!-item-!-188;#058&005728) Goronian lawmaker: Goronia's Cheese Importation Board, the agency responsible for inspecting all wholesale shipments of cheese entering Goronia from abroad and rejecting shipments that fail to meet specified standards, rejects about one percent of the cheese that it inspects. Since the health consequences and associated costs of not rejecting that one percent would be negligible, whereas the cost of maintaining the agency is not, the agency's cost clearly outweighs the benefits it provides. Knowing the answer to which of the following would be most useful in evaluating the lawmaker's argument? A. Are any of the types of cheeses that are imported into Goronia also produced in Goronia?
The argument does not talk about competence. B. Has the Cheese Importation Board, over the last several years, reduced its operating costs by eliminating inefficiencies within the agency itself?
Reducing costs is not included in the argument. C. Does the possibility of having merchandise rejected by the Cheese Importation Board deter many cheese exporters from shipping substandard cheese to Goronia?
Since the function of Importation Board is to reject shipments that fail to meet specified standards, if there is more substandard cheese shipped to Goronia, the conclusion should be questionable. BA D. Are there any exporters of cheese to Goronia whose merchandise is never rejected by the Cheese Importation Board?
Since only 1% is rejected, the answer choice is irrelevant. E. How is the cheese rejected by the Cheese Importation Board disposed of?
“How to dispose of the rejected cheese” is outside the scope of the argument.
90. (29250-!-item-!-188;#058&004038) In the nation of Partoria, large trucks currently have a much higher rate of traffic accidents per mile driven than other vehicles do. However, the very largest trucks—those with three trailers—had less than a third of the accident rate of single- and double-trailer trucks. Clearly, therefore, one way for Partoria to reduce the number of traffic accidents would be to require shippers to increase their use of triple-trailer trucks. Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument? A. Partorian trucking companies currently use triple-trailer trucks only for long trips using major highways, which is the safest kind of trip for large trucks.
Since the triple-trailer trucks only are used on the safest trip, the conclusion should be highly questionable. BA B. No matter what changes Partoria makes in the regulation of trucking, it will have to keep some smaller roads off-limits to all large trucks.
This may help reduce accidents related large trucks, but it has nothing to do with the transition. C. Increased use of triple-trailer trucks would mean that large trucks would account for a smaller proportion of all miles driven on Partoria’s roads than they currently do.
Since those triple-trailer trucks can carry more cargos, the number of large trucks will be smaller, thus strengthening the argument. D. In Partoria, the safety record of the trucking industry as a whole has improved slightly over the past ten years.
The safety record of the trucking industry is outside the scope of the argument. E. The volume of truck traffic on Partoria’s highways could be reduced by encouraging shippers to use rail transport whenever possible.
Rail transport is irrelevant.
91. (26045-!-item-!-188;#058&001846) Journalist: Every election year at this time the state government releases the financial disclosures that potential candidates must make in order to be eligible to run for office. Among those making the required financial disclosure this year is a prominent local businessman, Arnold Bergeron. There has often been talk in the past of Mr. Bergeron's running for governor, not least from Mr. Bergeron himself. This year it is likely he finally will, since those who have discounted the possibility of a Bergeron candidacy have always pointed to the necessity of making financial disclosure as the main obstacle to such a candidacy. In the journalist's argument, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles? A. The first provides information without which the argument lacks force; the second states the main conclusion of the argument. B. The first provides information without which the argument lacks force; the second states an intermediate conclusion that is used to support a further conclusion. C. The first describes a practice that the journalist seeks to defend; the second cites a likely consequence of this practice. D. The first states evidence bearing against the main conclusion of the argument; the second states that conclusion. E. Each provides evidence in support of an intermediate conclusion that supports a further conclusion stated in the argument.
92. (24787-!-item-!-188;#058&001210) (GWD-3-Q38) Kate: The recent decline in numbers of the Tennessee warbler, a North American songbird that migrates each fall to coffee plantations in South America, is due to the elimination of the dense tree cover that formerly was a feature of most South American coffee plantations. Scott: The population of the spruce budworm, the warbler's favorite prey in North America, has been dropping. This is a more likely explanation of the warbler's decline. Which of the following, if true, most seriously calls Scott's hypothesis into question? A. The numbers of the Baltimore oriole, a songbird that does not eat budworms but is as dependent on South American coffee plantations as is the Tennessee warbler, are declining.
This answer choice points out the elimination of coffee plantations in South American is the main cause for the decline in the population of Tennessee warbler, thus weakening Scott’s reasoning. BA B. The spruce budworm population has dropped because of a disease that can infect budworms but not Tennessee warblers.
In fact, it strengthens Scott’s explanation. C. The drop in the population of the spruce budworm is expected to be only temporary.
Even though the decrease is expected to be only temporary, it can still influence the songbirds’ population. D. Many Tennessee warblers have begun migrating in the fall to places other than traditional coffee plantations.
Actually, it weakens Kate’s reasoning. E. Although many North American songbirds have declined in numbers, no other species has experienced as great a decline as has the Tennessee warbler.
It cannot weaken Scott’s explanation.
|
|