ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 3023|回复: 7
打印 上一主题 下一主题

新PREP CR1 74,急救

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-11-10 21:51:29 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |正序浏览 |阅读模式
74. (29534-!-item-!-188;#058&004138)
Ina certain wildlife park, park rangers are able to track the movements of manyrhinoceroses because those animals wear radio collars.  When, as often happens, a collar slips off,it is put back on.  utting a collar on arhinoceros involves immobilizing the animal by shooting it with a tranquilizerdart.  Female rhinoceroses that have beenfrequently recollared have significantly lower fertility rates than uncollaredfemales.  robably, therefore, somesubstance in the tranquilizer inhibits fertility.
Inevaluating the argument, it would be most useful to determine which of thefollowing?
A. Whether there are more collaredfemale rhinoceroses than uncollared female rhinoceroses in the park
B. How the tranquilizer that is used forimmobilizing rhinoceroses differs, if at all, from tranquilizers used inworking with other large mammals
C. How often park rangers need to usetranquilizer darts to immobilize rhinoceroses for reasons other than attachingradio collars
D. Whether male rhinoceroses in the wildlife parklose their collars any more often than the park’s female rhinoceroses do
E. Whether radio collars are the only practical means that park rangershave for tracking the movements of rhinoceroses in the park

为什么是C啊? A不对吗?我在百度(http://zhidao.baidu.com/question/171889740.html)上面找到有人说是A喔!


我比较迷惑所以想请教大家!





收藏收藏 收藏收藏
8#
发表于 2012-3-5 21:50:23 | 只看该作者
The premises: 1) Tranquilizer used during recollarization: Recollared --> tranquilizer used
2) Recollared females have low fertility. Recollared --> low fertility
The conclusion: some substance in the tranquilizer inhibits fertility: tranquilizer used  --> low fertility

For this argument to hold, the assumption is that NOTHING other than the tranquilizer can cause low fertility.

C is the answer since
1) If further evidence shows that never-recollared females who have been tranquilized also have low fertility, then the argument is strengthened.

2) If futher evidence shows that never-recollared females who have been tranquilized do NOT have low fertility, then the argument is weakened.

If we know that the tranquilizer is never used other than collarizing rhinos, the argument is valid.

However, if we know that the tranquilizer is used in other situations on female rhinos, plus the info from the stimulus that these affected female rhinos do not have low fertility rate, then the argument that the tranquilizer causes low fertility in female rhinos will be in trouble.

Therefore, whether tranquilizer is used in other situations is an important information to have for the evaluation of the argument.

As to the strenthening or weakening aspect, you have to look at the conclusion, which links the tranquilizer to low fertility. If new findings add more weight behind the conclusion, it's a strengthener. If new finidings cast doubt on the conclusion, it's a weakener.
-- by 会员 sdcar2010 (2011/11/10 23:08:20)


Impressive!
7#
发表于 2011-11-19 16:28:48 | 只看该作者
强悍!
6#
发表于 2011-11-14 20:04:03 | 只看该作者
神奇的sdcar2010!! 谢谢!
5#
发表于 2011-11-14 16:55:20 | 只看该作者
谢谢。。。
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2011-11-11 20:13:08 | 只看该作者
多新sdcar2010, I LOVE YOU
板凳
发表于 2011-11-11 08:42:21 | 只看该作者
感谢sdcar2010,每次看你的评论都恍然大悟
沙发
发表于 2011-11-10 23:08:20 | 只看该作者
The premises: 1) Tranquilizer used during recollarization: Recollared --> tranquilizer used
2) Recollared females have low fertility. Recollared --> low fertility
The conclusion: some substance in the tranquilizer inhibits fertility: tranquilizer used  --> low fertility

For this argument to hold, the assumption is that NOTHING other than the tranquilizer can cause low fertility.

C is the answer since
1) If further evidence shows that never-recollared females who have been tranquilized also have low fertility, then the argument is strengthened.

2) If futher evidence shows that never-recollared females who have been tranquilized do NOT have low fertility, then the argument is weakened.

If we know that the tranquilizer is never used other than collarizing rhinos, the argument is valid.

However, if we know that the tranquilizer is used in other situations on female rhinos, plus the info from the stimulus that these affected female rhinos do not have low fertility rate, then the argument that the tranquilizer causes low fertility in female rhinos will be in trouble.

Therefore, whether tranquilizer is used in other situations is an important information to have for the evaluation of the argument.

As to the strenthening or weakening aspect, you have to look at the conclusion, which links the tranquilizer to low fertility. If new findings add more weight behind the conclusion, it's a strengthener. If new finidings cast doubt on the conclusion, it's a weakener.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-9 15:53
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部