ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

In Kravonia, the average salary for jobs requiring a college degree has always been higher than the average salary for jobs that do not require a degree. Over the last few years, the number of Kravonians enrolled in college has been growing steadily. Therefore, the number of Kravonians entering the job market who have at least the qualification of a college degree will eventually be significantly higher than it has been over the last few years.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

正确答案: B

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4716

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 2564|回复: 11
打印 上一主题 下一主题

急求一道CR 绕啊的有点晕

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-10-27 17:54:41 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |正序浏览 |阅读模式
In Kravonia, the average salary for jobs requiring a college degree has always been higher than the average salary for jobs that do not require a degree.  Over the last few years, the number of Kravonians enrolled in college has been growing steadily.  Therefore, the number of Kravonians entering the job market who have at least the qualification of a college degree will eventually be significantly higher than it has been over the last few years.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

A. Kravonians with more than one college degree earn little more, on average, than do Kravonians with only one college degree.
B. The average number of years Kravonian college students remain enrolled before completing a degree has been increasing over the past several years.
C. Despite the increase in the number of Kravonians attending college, the percentage of the population attending college is lower in Kravonia than in most other countries.
D. In recent years, employers have been requiring college degrees for workers in jobs that were previously performed successfully by Kravonians who did not have college degrees.
E. For many years, employers in Kravonia have had difficulty finding enough college graduates to fill the high-paying jobs that were available.
有没有好心的童鞋解释解释正确答案 ,选B。。。Thanks!!
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
12#
发表于 2011-10-28 18:19:55 | 只看该作者
我咋觉得B说的不是应届不应届的问题而是延长毕业时间的问题 你觉得呢
-- by 会员 reneegreen (2011/10/27 19:42:12)



我的意思是可能出现在的assumption情况!思路而已~我没表达清晰~
11#
 楼主| 发表于 2011-10-28 12:57:54 | 只看该作者
恩恩 我也觉得我扣得太细了~~谢啦
10#
发表于 2011-10-27 20:51:48 | 只看该作者
In Kravonia, the average salary for jobs requiring a college degree has always been higher than the average salary for jobs that do not require a degree.  Over the last few years, the number of Kravonians enrolled in college has been growing steadily.  Therefore, who have at least the qualification of a college degree will eventually be significantly higher than it has been over the last few years.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

A. Kravonians with more than one college degree earn little more, on average, than do Kravonians with only one college degree.
B. The average number of years Kravonian college students remain enrolled before completing a degree has been increasing over the past several years.
C. Despite the increase in the number of Kravonians attending college, the percentage of the population attending college is lower in Kravonia than in most other countries.
D. In recent years, employers have been requiring college degrees for workers in jobs that were previously performed successfully by Kravonians who did not have college degrees.
E. For many years, employers in Kravonia have had difficulty finding enough college graduates to fill the high-paying jobs that were available.
有没有好心的童鞋解释解释正确答案 ,选B。。。Thanks!!
-- by 会员 疯愁怂狗子 (2011/10/27 17:54:41)



B is the best answer.


"students remain enrolled before completing a degree" indicates that although the number of students who went to college has increased, the number of students who got degree may not increase that much. That is to say, some students can remain in the college but don't graduate for some reasons, such as extending study.
So the students go to work market may not increase...
Is it clear enough?
9#
发表于 2011-10-27 19:42:12 | 只看该作者
我咋觉得B说的不是应届不应届的问题而是延长毕业时间的问题 你觉得呢
8#
发表于 2011-10-27 18:52:10 | 只看该作者
根据选项和题目是否相关,把除B以外的所有选项都干掉。
A 原文没有提多于一个大学学历的事情
C原文没提Kravonia与其他国家比较
D原文没提雇主提供一个岗位之前是没大学学历现在是大学学历的人干
E同样原文没提
通过这个思路我根本就没完全琢磨明白B是个啥意思,但是我粗略看感觉说的和原文是相关的事情,于是选B
-- by 会员 limingdaili (2011/10/27 18:39:47)



弱弱地问一句,我觉得E是加强,你觉得呢?~
7#
发表于 2011-10-27 18:47:12 | 只看该作者
LZ要分清楚题目中的论据和结论。论据:有degree工资大于没有的,入学人数增加;结论:在要求degree的人才市场,入职人数多于以往。 很明显,你可以看出当中的逻辑漏洞,也就是缺少的assumption(比如:不一定只有应届生在求职或者其他情况)
A 无关
B 正是上述的思路推测得到
C 无关(选项内容未在文中出现)
D 无关(结论限定”要求degree的人才市场“上)
E 加强 (因为那么多年来没找到,现在供应多了,这些职位也能被满足)
6#
发表于 2011-10-27 18:39:47 | 只看该作者
根据选项和题目是否相关,把除B以外的所有选项都干掉。
A 原文没有提多于一个大学学历的事情
C原文没提Kravonia与其他国家比较
D原文没提雇主提供一个岗位之前是没大学学历现在是大学学历的人干
E同样原文没提
通过这个思路我根本就没完全琢磨明白B是个啥意思,但是我粗略看感觉说的和原文是相关的事情,于是选B
5#
发表于 2011-10-27 18:31:25 | 只看该作者
GWD的思路是
a 说的 one college degree earn  原文虽然前面说了这个工资,但是主要说毕业生的数量,和工资没多大关系 杀
b completing a degree 的数量   留着
c  the percentage of the population   原文没提 杀
d employers的事儿    杀
e   还是 employers         杀掉了
地板
发表于 2011-10-27 18:29:39 | 只看该作者
我觉得楼主抠的有点细了,呵呵。

时间顺序是  入学  学习  毕业

如果从现在来看,过去学习时间拉长的话,显然会影响现在或未来毕业的时间。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-10-10 02:27
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部