GWD17-Q11
: 这道题相当interesting,首先顺一下逻辑链条,a地的鸟被g这种最近在增长的东西所替代,g虽然是捕猎的对象,但是很不幸打猎季节有规定,如果相对减少了5%就会提前停止。所以去掉这个约束,更多的当地生物会恢复。
Some species of Arctic birds are threatened by recent sharp increases in the population of snow geese,
which breed in the Arctic and are displacing birds of less vigorous species. Although snow geese are a
popular quarry for hunters in the southern regions where they winter, the hunting season ends if and
when hunting has reduced the population by five percent, according to official estimates. Clearly,
dropping this restriction would allow the other species to recover.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the argument?
A. Hunting limits for snow geese were imposed many years ago
in response to a sharp decline in the population of snow geese.
B. It has been many years since the restriction led to the hunting season
for snow geese being closed earlier than the scheduled date.
我当时就是AB迷惑了,其实你重点必须抓住原文,原文说的restriction是啥很重要,就是那个提前结束的法令,所以A说的很明显对象部队,错误,B就是说去掉了也没用,你想这个市最近鸟类减少,问题是你这个约束n多年前就有了,要是真是约束的原因,我怎没见你早期就申报要停止!!所以B 记住:相关/无关提速!!
C. The number of snow geese taken by hunters each year has grown every year for several years.
D. As their population has increased, snow geese have recolonized wintering grounds that they had not used for several seasons.
E. In the snow goose’s winter habitats, the goose faces no significant natural predation.
没看出B哪里削弱了
-- by 会员 charlesgmat (2011/10/3 1:46:14)