- UID
- 653406
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2011-7-21
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
1-18
86 45’’
Background info: state adds a 7 percent sales tax for the goods.
Conclusion: this sales act as an income tax, and the lower class people are charged higher level of tax than upper class.
Premise: lower class people need to buy more ordinary goods, which are charged with this 7 percent sales tax.
87 45’’
Fact1: the average age of CEO nowadays is 57
Fact2: the average age of those executives are 20 years smaller than age of today’s CEO.
Conclusion: CEO tends to older now.
Weaken: retirement law requires corporate executives work until 60, or the TMTs cannot obtain the whole pension they got 20 years ago.
88 82’’
Fact1: Radio interferometry is a technique to study celestial objects and it combines signals from space radio telescopes.
Fact2: need ultraprecise timing, exact knowledge of locations of the telescope, computer programs.
Fact3: successful linking is a significant technological accomplishment.
Infer: this technique can find more exoplanet.
89 34’’
Premise: value of a product depends on the ratio of its quality to price.
Argument: the higher value, the better the competitive position.
Conclusion: increasing the quality or lowing the price will make customer to select the product.
Strengthen: All the salary products in the market have a lower price or better quality, or have the both.
90 60’’ AWA
Argument: dedicating the Cookville factory entirely to drill bit production and shifting all other machine part production to our other factories will help us to attain that larger goal.
Points:
1. To begin with, the manager commits a mistake about a simple principle in economics: the economy of scale. Though Cookville makes drill bits efficiently in recent scale, no evidence is provided by the author that Cookville will still produce on an efficient point when added more apparatus and workers…
2. Furthermore, though Cookville now produces drill in a higher productivity, in no cases can this mere fact be sited as an evidence that turning Cookville to a professional drill factory from a diversified factory will deduce the production cost and increase the whole efficiency of corporation. For example, the cut mechanics in Cookville might not collaborate with their colleagues in another factory, or they might ask for a salary increased to mitigate the loss in their rearrangement. All of above might increase the management costs and make shifting production unacceptable.
3. Last but not least. A causal relationship false exists in the argument. The author imprudently predict that to lower the production costs can necessarily assure the corporation to achieve a ‘larger goal’. In his deduction, he neglects some factors which need to be addressed if the corporation really want to obscure its ‘large goal’. For example, to sale out the products, Cookville should have a precise marketing plan and they …
|
|