ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Journalist: Well-known businessman Arnold Bergeron has long been popular in the state, and he has often talked about running for governor, but he has never run. However, we have just learned that Bergeron has fulfilled the financial disclosure requirement for candidacy by submitting a detailed list of his current financial holdings to the election commission. So, it is very likely that Bergeron will be a candidate for governor this year.

The answer to which of the following questions would be most useful in evaluating the journalist's argument?

正确答案: E

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4716

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 5592|回复: 13
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD20-Q38~有争议的一道题,求助NN~

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-8-2 20:49:27 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |正序浏览 |阅读模式
Journalist:Well-known businessman Arnold Bergeron has long been popular in the state, and he has often talked about running for governor, but he has never run.However, we have just learned that Bergeron has fulfilled the financial disclosure requirement for candidacy by submitting a detailed list of his current financial holdings to the election commission.So, it is very likely that Bergeron will be a candidate for governor this year.


The answer to which of the following questions would be most useful in evaluating the journalist’s argument?

A.Has anybody else who has fulfilled the financial disclosure requirement for the upcoming election reported greater financial holdings than Bergeron?
B.Is submitting a list of holdings the only way to fulfill the election commission’s financial disclosure requirements?
C.Did the information recently obtained by the journalists come directly from the election commission?
D.Have Bergeron’s financial holdings increased in value in recent years?
E.Had Bergeron also fulfilled the financial disclosure requirements for candidacy before any previous gubernatorial elections?

此题的答案是E。
我认为是C,看过以前的一个讨论帖,更加相信C了。
如果对C的回答是no,不就不能得出他要参选么,如果连消息都是错误,哪里还会有后面的结论呢?
open to discussion~~~
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
14#
发表于 2013-4-29 21:16:19 | 只看该作者
好吧,当我没有说,现在懂了。我把结论没有好好读
13#
发表于 2013-4-29 21:14:10 | 只看该作者
B 为什么不对?
12#
 楼主| 发表于 2011-8-3 11:47:20 | 只看该作者
ChasingM7 说的符合逻辑。gmat 中除非问你前提相关的,不然前提就是真理。

题目给你的东西,那就是真的。自己别假设前提是假的。
-- by 会员 chasingM7 (2011/8/2 22:22:00)





可是,为什么不能削弱前提呢,削弱了前提不就是削弱了结论嘛。
对D的回答是no,那么就削弱了前提了啊~
-- by 会员 evelyn205205 (2011/8/2 22:27:34)


-- by 会员 edmondxie (2011/8/3 11:42:02)



Alright, I got that。
Thx~
11#
发表于 2011-8-3 11:42:02 | 只看该作者
ChasingM7 说的符合逻辑。gmat 中除非问你前提相关的,不然前提就是真理。

题目给你的东西,那就是真的。自己别假设前提是假的。
-- by 会员 chasingM7 (2011/8/2 22:22:00)




可是,为什么不能削弱前提呢,削弱了前提不就是削弱了结论嘛。
对D的回答是no,那么就削弱了前提了啊~
-- by 会员 evelyn205205 (2011/8/2 22:27:34)

10#
 楼主| 发表于 2011-8-3 11:16:58 | 只看该作者
upupup~
9#
 楼主| 发表于 2011-8-3 10:36:44 | 只看该作者
up~
8#
 楼主| 发表于 2011-8-3 09:36:25 | 只看该作者
顶~
7#
 楼主| 发表于 2011-8-2 23:02:36 | 只看该作者
顶!open to discussion~
6#
 楼主| 发表于 2011-8-2 22:27:34 | 只看该作者
题目给你的东西,那就是真的。自己别假设前提是假的。
-- by 会员 chasingM7 (2011/8/2 22:22:00)



可是,为什么不能削弱前提呢,削弱了前提不就是削弱了结论嘛。
对D的回答是no,那么就削弱了前提了啊~
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-10-16 14:41
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部