ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 12958|回复: 14
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG12 CR 89 求赐教!!!

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-7-20 01:00:50 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |正序浏览 |阅读模式
89. Since it has become known that several of a bank’s top executives have been buying shares in their own
bank, the bank’s depositors, who had been worried by rumors that the bank faced impending fi nancial collapse,
have been greatly relieved. They reason that, since top executives evidently have faith in the bank’s fi nancial
soundness, those worrisome rumors must be false. Such reasoning might well be overoptimistic, however, since
corporate executives have been known to buy shares in their own company in a calculated attempt
to dispel negative rumors about the company’s health.
In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?
(A) The fi rst describes evidence that has been taken as supporting a conclusion; the second gives a reason
for questioning that support.
(B) The fi rst describes evidence that has been taken as supporting a conclusion; the second states a contrary
conclusion that is the main conclusion of the argument.
(C) The fi rst provides evidence in support of the main conclusion of the argument; the second states that
conclusion.
(D) The fi rst describes the circumstance that the argument as a whole seeks to explain; the second gives the
explanation that the argument seeks to establish.
(E) The fi rst describes the circumstance that the argument as a whole seeks to explain; the second provides
evidence in support of the explanation that the argument seeks to establish.
我的思路:
由于第一个boldface和第二个boldface前面有SINCE,所以两个都应该是个论证,直接排除BC(CONCLUSION),然后,如何排除DE呢??请诸位牛人帮助解答!
收藏收藏1 收藏收藏1
15#
发表于 2020-8-4 14:22:52 | 只看该作者
sdcar2010 发表于 2011-7-20 20:54
Both BF are premises . . . Only A says so.

you know nothing
14#
发表于 2018-10-11 14:07:17 | 只看该作者
jiangjingle 发表于 2012-8-12 15:46
Conclusion 应该是作者的观点吧,我觉得应该是Such reasoning mightwell be overoptimistic,(conclusion), ...

真正的conclusion是这个!
since top executives evidently have faith in the bank's financial soundness, those worrisome rumors must be false. 这样一切都说得通了
13#
发表于 2018-10-11 14:04:17 | 只看该作者
monoecy 发表于 2012-7-22 23:58
NN,问一下,我是这样理解的,为什么不可以呢?Since it hasbecome known that several of a bank'stop  ...

太有道理了!!醍醐灌顶hhh
12#
发表于 2012-11-20 19:55:10 | 只看该作者
Conclusion 应该是作者的观点吧,我觉得应该是Such reasoning mightwell be overoptimistic,(conclusion),但是这样为什么说不通?这道题的conclusion到底在哪里?
-- by 会员 jiangjingle (2012/8/12 15:46:07)



楼上的johnwolf大神的解释很清晰~


DE不对的原因是短文根本不想解释这种现象,而是要反驳A中的“a conclusion”。结构大概是:不明真相的群众:证据A1,结论A2.作者:结论B1,证据B2

“a conclusion”是A2,BF1是A1,BF2是B2,作者真正的观点是A1:“Such reasoning might well be overoptimistic”


11#
发表于 2012-8-12 15:46:07 | 只看该作者
Conclusion 应该是作者的观点吧,我觉得应该是Such reasoning mightwell be overoptimistic,(conclusion),但是这样为什么说不通?这道题的conclusion到底在哪里?
10#
发表于 2012-7-22 23:58:46 | 只看该作者
NN,问一下,我是这样理解的,为什么不可以呢?
Since it hasbecome known that several of a bank'stop executives have been buying shares in their own bank,the bank'sdepositors, who had been worriedby rumorsthat the bank faced impendingfinancial collapse, havebeengreatlyrelieved.(backgroud)They reason that, since top executivesevidently have faith in thebank's financial soundness,thoseworrisomerumorsmustbefalse. (opposing opinion) Such reasoning mightwell be overoptimistic,(conclusion)however, since corporateexecutives have been known to buy shares in their own company in a calculatedattempt to dispel negative rumors about the company's health.(the explanation)

so I choose D
(D)  The first describes the circumstance that the argument asa wholeseeks to explain; the secondgives the explanation that the argumentseeks to establish.
-- by 会员 cireb (2011/7/24 21:06:42)



这道题屡做屡错, 一直都按这种逻辑想, 所以在D,E 之间挣扎
但是仔细一想会发现, 哪有conclusion 还用might 开头的啊!!! 这也太不自信了吧!
所以, 还是另一种说法比较说得通, conclusion 是 since top executivesevidently have faith in thebank's financial soundness,thoseworrisomerumorsmustbefalse, 而后面那一堆是用来反驳conclusion 的
9#
发表于 2012-2-18 16:45:52 | 只看该作者

说的很有道理

很有帮助
8#
发表于 2011-12-12 21:42:08 | 只看该作者
DE不对的原因是短文根本不想解释这种现象,而是要反驳A中的“a conclusion”。结构大概是:不明真相的群众:证据A1,结论A2.作者:结论B1,证据B2

“a conclusion”是A2,BF1是A1,BF2是B2,作者真正的观点是A1:“Such reasoning might well be overoptimistic”
7#
发表于 2011-8-2 09:00:22 | 只看该作者
我明白了~我把d答案里的第二个explanation理解成了可以包含supporting。。。Thank you!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-10-6 06:33
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部