虽然这道og上的题目有人问过，可是我至今还是不理解。有哪位大牛可以给我写一下推理链么？

ss27

63. When hypnotized subjects are told that they are deaf and are then asked whether they can hear the hypnotist, they reply, “No.” Some theorists try to explain this result by arguing that the selves of hypnotized subjects are dissociated into separate parts, and that the part that is deaf is dissociated from the part that replies.
Which of the following challenges indicates the most serious weakness in the attempted explanation described above?

(A)Why does the part that replies not answer, “Yes”? A

(B) Why are the observed facts in need of any special explanation?

(C) Why do the subjects appear to accept the hypnotist’s suggestion that they are deaf?

(D) Why do hypnotized subjects all respond the same way in the situation described?

(E) Why are the separate parts of the self the same for all subjects?

sdcar2010

#1 is right.
#2 is wrong.

ss27

谢谢楼上两位。能不能也再给我解释一下其它几个选项？

liuxuanlihao

我觉得LS说得不是很准确
我觉得应该是如果那两部分是分开的，那么回答者的回答应该是随机的，就是有可能是YES有可能是NO。
但由于回答者总是回答NO，所以那两部分实际上应该是有联系的

Christianyang

因为回复和听到是不同区域，所以回答NO.
但是比如说听到的那个区域被催眠了，回复的区域没被催眠。那么就是回复的那个区域来回答吧，回复的区域听到了，所以当然应当回答yes。回复的区域回答NO岂不是很怪异了。