ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1813|回复: 5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

陈向东逻辑-strengthen

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-7-10 23:33:51 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |正序浏览 |阅读模式
Many people acquire software programs for their home computers by illegally copying those programs rather than purchasing them. People who own home computers must be making, on average, fewer illegal copies of software programs than before, however, since the average number of software programs that people purchase to use on their home computers has increased substantially over the past five years
Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?

A. The number of home computers in use has increased substantially over the past 5 years.
B. 5 years ago, about half of the software programs used on home computers had been illegally copied rather than purchased.
C. Most people who have home computers use their computers more frequently the longer they have been.
D. few people who prefer to copy computer software programs illegally cannot copy the software programs they want because they have no acquaintances who have those software programs.
E. on average, people with home computers have the same number of software programs today as people with home computer did five years ago.

答案是E。
不懂A哪里错了,为什么解释说它起到了反对原文的作用?
请NN帮我解释一下哦~谢谢啦~
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
6#
 楼主| 发表于 2011-7-11 16:58:44 | 只看该作者
你把它看成两个人分蛋糕嘛,
如果蛋糕大小不变,“一个人分的多了所以另一个人分的少了”正确性得到加强。正如E
相反如果蛋糕变大了,一个人分得多了并不见得另一个人分的少了,正如A
你是英文没读清楚吧?
-- by 会员 chenjiao0121 (2011/7/11 16:35:50)



懂了,谢谢你形象的说明~
5#
发表于 2011-7-11 16:35:50 | 只看该作者
你把它看成两个人分蛋糕嘛,
如果蛋糕大小不变,“一个人分的多了所以另一个人分的少了”正确性得到加强。正如E
相反如果蛋糕变大了,一个人分得多了并不见得另一个人分的少了,正如A
你是英文没读清楚吧?
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2011-7-11 16:16:45 | 只看该作者
顶一下
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2011-7-11 14:16:17 | 只看该作者
有米有人帮帮我啦?
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2011-7-11 12:17:03 | 只看该作者
求助求助!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-6-6 23:55
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部