TTGWD11-Q32(bf题已搜，依旧不解，求nn解决)

mlvince

Q17: TTGWD11-Q32:（對照GWD10-Q17）
Editorial: An arrest made by a Midville police officer is provisional until the officer has taken the suspect to the police station and the watch commander has officially approved the arrest.  Such approval is denied if the commander judges that the evidence on which the provisional arrest is based is insufficient.  A government efficiency expert has observed that ［［almost all provisional arrests meet the standards for adequacy of evidence that the watch commanders enforce］］.  The expert has therefore recommended that because ［［the officers’ time spent obtaining approval is largely wasted,］］ the watch commander’s approval no longer be required.  This recommendation should be rejected as dangerous, however, since there is no assurance that the watch commanders’ standards will continue to be observed once approval is longer required.
In the editorial, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?
A.    The first is a claim, the accuracy of which is disputed by the editorial; the second is a conclusion drawn in order to support the main conclusion of the editorial.
B.    The first is an observation that the editorial disputes; the second is a conclusion that was drawn from that observation.
C.    The first is a finding that was used in support of a proposal that the editorial opposes; the second is a judgment that was based on that finding and in turn was used to support the proposal.
D.    The first is a finding introduced to support the main conclusion of the editorial; the second is that main conclusion.
E.    The first is a conclusion, the evidence for which the editorial evaluates; the second is part of the evidence cited in favor of that conclusion.
答案是c，我选b，，，求思路，谢谢

典座

我得到的答案选D.........我还认真看了半天

Apan0988

87

pygmysog

Q17: TTGWD11-Q32:（對照GWD10-Q17）
Editorial: An arrest made by a Midville police officer is provisional until the officer has taken the suspect to the police station and the watch commander has officially approved the arrest.
Such approval is denied if the commander judges that the evidence on which the provisional arrest is based is insufficient.  
A government efficiency expert has observed that almost all provisional arrests meet the standards for adequacy of evidence that the watch commanders enforce.  
The expert has therefore recommended that because the officers’ time spent obtaining approval is largely wasted, the watch commander’s approval no longer be required.
This recommendation should be rejected as dangerous, however, since there is no assurance that the watch commanders’ standards will continue to be observed once approval is longer required.

In the editorial, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

A.    The first is a claim, the accuracy of which is disputed by the editorial; the second is a conclusion drawn in order to support the main conclusion of the editorial.
B.    The first is an observation that the editorial disputes; the second is a conclusion that was drawn from that observation.
C.    The first is a finding that was used in support of a proposal that the editorial opposes; the second is a judgement that was based on that finding and in turn was used to support the proposal.
D.    The first is a finding introduced to support the main conclusion of the editorial; the second judgment that was that main conclusion.
E.    The first is a conclusion, the evidence for which the editorial evaluates; the second is part of the evidence cited in favor of that conclusion.

想根据observe排除A.E，因为不是claim 和 conclusion; 接着根据recommend和however排除B.C，因为后半句不是结论。最后检查一下C，确认没问题。

mlvince

There is only one MAIN conclusion. There might be MANY intermediate conclusions.

-- by 会员 sdcar2010 (2011/6/4 19:49:51)

明白了，谢谢

sdcar2010

There is only one MAIN conclusion. There might be MANY intermediate conclusions.

mlvince

First of all, you need to identify the conclusion of the passage, which is the last sentence. Hence the conclusion is: the recommendation of the expert is wrong. The author in this case is the editor who wrote this editorial.

Secondly, the 1st BF is simply a fact or finding, which was used by the expert to support his recommendation. Notice the connect "The expert has therefore recommended". This phrase indicate that the sentence before this phrase is the premise for the conclusion of the expert.

Third, in the passage, the author did not dispute the accuracy of the 1st BF. So B is wrong.

-- by 会员 sdcar2010 (2011/6/4 12:16:27)

谢谢，有点明白了，再问下，bf题里不管是不是有转折，整篇文章都只有一个conclusion？

sdcar2010

First of all, you need to identify the conclusion of the passage, which is the last sentence. Hence the conclusion is: the recommendation of the expert is wrong. The author in this case is the editor who wrote this editorial.

Secondly, the 1st BF is simply a fact or finding, which was used by the expert to support his recommendation. Notice the connect "The expert has therefore recommended". This phrase indicate that the sentence before this phrase is the premise for the conclusion of the expert.

Third, in the passage, the author did not dispute the accuracy of the 1st BF. So B is wrong.