ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2113|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD逻辑题找关系

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-4-10 23:05:32 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |正序浏览 |阅读模式
Which of the flowing most logically completes the argument?

The attribution of the choral work Lacrimae to the composer Pescard (1400 – 1474) has been regarded as tentative, since it was based on a single treatise from the early 1500’s that named Pescard as the composer.Recently, several musical treatises from the late 1500’
s have come to light, all of which name Pescard as the composer of Lacrimae.Unfortunately, these newly discovered treatises lend no support to the attribution of Lacrimae to Pescard, since _______.
  1. the treatise from the early 1500’s misidentifies the composers of some of the musical works it considers

  • the author of the treatise from the early 1500’s had no very strong evidence on which to base the identification of Pescard as the composer of Lacrimae

  • there are works that can conclusively be attributed to Pescard that are not even mentioned in the treatise from the early 1500’s

  • the later treatises probably had no source for their attribution other than the earlier treatise

  • no known treatises from the 1600’s identify Pescard as the composer of Lacrimae

    找关系?D
  • 收藏收藏 收藏收藏
    沙发
    发表于 2011-4-11 17:19:55 | 只看该作者
    是D无疑。
    文章逻辑,P是L的作者合一结论并不可信,因为人们只依据一个16世纪早期的文献做出的判断。一些16世纪晚期的作品也说P是L的作者,但是这一结论也不可信,因为:
    D说,那些16世纪晚期的文献是依照早期的文献所编写的。(也就是说没有事实上引入新的证据)
    您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

    手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-26 13:54
    京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

    ChaseDream 论坛

    © 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

    返回顶部