ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2900|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG 12 56求教~~~

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-3-12 22:46:50 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |正序浏览 |阅读模式
56. The fewer restrictions there are on the advertising of legal services, the more lawyers there are who advertise their services, and the lawyers who advertise a specific service usually charge less for that service than the lawyers who do not advertise. Therefore, if the state removes ant of its current restrictions, such as the one against advertisements that do not specify fee arrangements, overall consumer legal costs will be lower than if the state retains its current restrictions
If the statements above are true, which of the following must be true?
B. More consumers will use legal services if there are fewer restrictions on the advertising of legal services
C. If the restriction against advertisements that do not specify fee arrangements is removed, more lawyers will advertise their services
就在这两项纠结了 答案C 蛋似 B 很logical 呀 既然费用降了 consumers当然更多地用legal services么...为什么就排除了B?
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2011-3-12 23:19:00 | 只看该作者
是不是像这种从原文推断的题目,只要找选项里面跟原题一样的话就可以了?
沙发
发表于 2011-3-12 23:09:08 | 只看该作者
The fewer restrictions there are on the advertising of legal services, the more lawyers there are who advertise their services,    各人认为,第一句就已经很直接地说出了C的意思了
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-6-21 04:41
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部