ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

People who have spent a lot of time in contact with animals often develop animal-induced allergies, some of them quite serious. In a survey of current employees in major zoos, about 30 percent had animal-induced allergies. Based on this sample, experts conclude that among members of the general population who have spent a similarly large amount of time in close contact with animals, the percentage with animal-induced allergies is not 30 percent but substantially more.

Which of the following, if true, provides the strongest grounds for the experts' conclusion?

正确答案: A

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 3317|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

问小蓝一题

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-2-27 11:47:11 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |正序浏览 |阅读模式
People who have spent a lot of time in contact with animals often develop animal-induced allergies, some of them quite serious. In a survey of current employees in major zoos, about 30 percent had animal-induced allergies. Based on this sample, experts conclude that among members of the general population who have spent a similarly large amout of time in close contact with animals, the percentage with animals-induced allergies is not 30 percent but substantially more.
Which of the following, if true, provides the strongest grounds for the experts' conclusion?
A. A zoo employee who develops a serious animal-induced allergy is very likely to switch to some other occupation.
B. Azoo employee is more likely than a person in the general population to keep one or more animal pets at home.
C. The percentage of the general population whose level of exposure to animals matches that of a zoo employee is quite small.
D. Exposure to domestic pets is, on the whole, less likely to cause animal-induced allergy than exposure to many of the animals kept in zoos.
E. Zoo employees seldom wear protective gear when they handle animals in their care.
ANSWER: A.
I CHOSE B.
希望各路牛牛帮我答疑解惑,谢谢啦~
我认为A和原文没有什么关系嘛
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2011-2-27 18:06:03 | 只看该作者
多谢sdcar2010~
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2011-2-27 17:46:53 | 只看该作者
XDF的蓝皮书
板凳
发表于 2011-2-27 13:59:08 | 只看该作者
小兰是啥。。。
沙发
发表于 2011-2-27 12:41:25 | 只看该作者
Premise: Around 30% of current zoo employees have animal-induced allergy.

Conclusion: If people spend time with animals as long as an average zoo employee, the percentage of them who would develop animal-induced allergy is much higher than 30%.

Don't you think it is odd that the general population would have a higher chance to develop animal-induced allergy than zoo employees??? This is a paradox!

Well, if A is true, the conclusion holds and the paradox is explained.  A says that a zoo employee can easily switch jobs to other professions.  Therefore, a fast turnover at the zoo prevents some zoo employees from developing animal-induced allergies and being counted in the zoo employee category. This effectively leads to a lower percentage in allergy cases for zoo employees than it should be for people who spend long time everyday with animals.

B is a weakener.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-1-12 03:46
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部