og12 52题 求分析我的错误之处

lnl555

52.The interview is an essential part of a successful hiringprogram because, with it, job applicants who have personalities that are unsuited to the requirements of the job will be eliminated from consideration.
The argument above logically depends on which of the following assumptions?
(A) A hiringprogram will be successful if it includes interviews.
(B) The interview is a more important part of a successful hiringprogram than is the development of a job description.
(C) Interviewers can accurately identify applicants whose personalities are unsuited to the requirements of the job.
(D) The only purpose of an interview is to evaluate whether job applicants’ personalities are suited to the requirements of the job.
(E) The fit of job applicants’ personalities to the requirements of the job was once the most important factor in making hiring decisions.
答案为 C

我认为：要是E的"was once"改成现在时就是对的
我的思路是 ：成功的hiring program  推出 排除unsuited(即interview)
那么假设就是：The fit of job applicants’ personalities to the requirements of the job is the most important factor in making hiring decisions。  
选择E(改进后的E)

OG答案的思路是：
interview eliminates unsuited candidates 推出 interview is important.
假设是 interview 真的能eliminates UC

题干中有 essential 和because 两逻辑词
我觉得我是利用了题目中的essential 而 OG是根据 because
请问，
1.是因为E语法是过去时才用  because的思路？那为什么答案说E不相关？
2.我的思路正确么？如果正确，跟OG比较，差在哪？

aiming

Can anybody explain why D is incorrect here? thanks...

418722521

LS, you still do not understand the meaning of necessary. The fit fit of job applicants’ personalities to the requirements of the job WOULD NEVER BE REQUIRED as the most important factor in making hiring decisions in order to make interview an essential part of a successful hiring program.

This means if you remove E, the interview is still an essential part of a successful hiring program because during an interview, other aspects of the candidate will be scrutinized.  For example, does the guy have the required knowledge of the trade? Does he speak perfect English? Does he think logically and quickly? How would he handle tough questions?

-- by 会员 sdcar2010 (2011/2/26 8:03:11)

我还是不懂 我觉得是架桥啊

sdcar2010

LS, you still do not understand the meaning of necessary. The fit of job applicants’ personalities to the requirements of the job WOULD NEVER BE REQUIRED as the most important factor in making hiring decisions in order to make interview an essential part of a successful hiring program.

This means if you remove E, the interview is still an essential part of a successful hiring program because during an interview, other aspects of the candidate will be scrutinized.  For example, does the guy have the required knowledge of the trade? Does he speak perfect English? Does he think logically and quickly? How would he handle tough questions?

lnl555

what i mean is that  if i think it this way:
        if "The interview is an essential part of a successful hiringprogram",
   the assumption must be like this
       the interview with which you can eliminate unsuitable people is a very important factor for a successful hiringprogram.(this is necessary,because if interview isn't a very important factor,how could interview be an essential part of a successful hiringprogram? )

    You may say that E says interview is "the most" improtant...  and it's not safe to say so.
    But i think, this is a assumption question; we assume E is true at the first place ,so if E could be the assumption ,it is ture.

   the above is based on that E's "was once" has been replaced by"is".

lnl555

what i mean is that  if i think it this way:
         if "The interview is an essential part of a successful hiringprogram",
    the assumption must be like this
        the interview with which you can eliminate unsuitable people is a very important factor for a successful hiringprogram.(this is necessary,because if interview isn't a very important factor,how could interview be an essential part of a successful hiringprogram? )

     You may say that E says interview is "the most" improtant...  and it's not safe to say so.
     But i think, this is a assumption question; we assume E is true at the first place ,so if E could be the assumption ,it is ture.
     
    the above is based on that E's "was once" has been replaced by"is".

sdcar2010

Let's put it this way, E is sufficient but NOT necessary for the conclusion of the arugment to hold. Think about it!

sdcar2010

What I said is that E is not a necessary assumption for the argument to hold. It is NOT necessary for E to be true in order for the argument to hold. Of course you have to prove the right answer IS required as a necessary assumption. That's all this type of question is about.

lnl555

但这不是在怀疑选项的正确性么，   但E作为假设我觉得按我的思路是成立的呀

lnl555

但这不是在怀疑选项的正确性么，   但E作为假设我觉得按我的思路是成立的呀