When people submit their posts to ChaseDream.com, their intentions cannot be more bad than good.Otherwise, as members of a close-knit on-line community, we would stop trusting each other. However, no on-line community, ChaseDream.com included, can survive without mutual trust among its members.
The argument is most vulnerable to which one of the following criticisms?
(A) It neglects the possibility that a true belief can have unexpected harmful consequences.
(B) It mistakenly assumes that if two different claims cannot be true at the same time, then both claims cannot be false at the same time.
(C) It questions the validity of a claim by calling into question the intentions of those who make the claim.
(D) It assumes without justification that whenever two possible outcomes are possible, inevitably the more negative one will occur.
(E) It gives no reason to believe that a statement that is true of a given online community is also true of any other online community.
想了半天还是没怎么懂啊
原文作者是想通过chasedream.com still survive --> people don't stop trusting each other --> more good than bad.
看大神分析说:even if more good than bad, there will still be some bad consequences.
但原文里表达的意思是no bad consequences (since online community still survive) so more good than bad. 感觉和上面没有什么关系诶。。。
想知道我的逻辑哪里错了。
Thanks a lot. I think I should analyze the passage more carefully.
I try to read the English newspaper once a day, but I find myself cannot understand the passage very well. After reading, I will spend much time to check the sentences and words I do not know in the dictionary. It takes me a lot of time.
Help! Am I on the right way to improve my reading?