ChaseDream
搜索
123下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 12020|回复: 27
打印 上一主题 下一主题

救命,OG12-104题

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-11-9 20:39:10 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |正序浏览 |阅读模式
这题到底是怎么个逻辑关系啊???高手们解答一下

104. Although the discount stores in Goreville’s central
shopping district are expected to close within fi ve
years as a result of competition from a SpendLess
discount department store that just opened, those
locations will not stay vacant for long. In the fi ve years
since the opening of Colson’s, a nondiscount
department store, a new store has opened at the
location of every store in the shopping district that
closed because it could not compete with Colson’s.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens
the argument?

(A) Many customers of Colson’s are expected to do
less shopping there than they did before the
SpendLess store opened.
(B) Increasingly, the stores that have opened in the
central shopping district since Colson’s opened
have been discount stores.
(C) At present, the central shopping district has as
many stores operating in it as it ever had.
(D) Over the course of the next fi ve years, it is
expected that Goreville’s population will grow at
a faster rate than it has for the past several
decades.
(E) Many stores in the central shopping district sell
types of merchandise that are not available at
either SpendLess or Colson’s.
收藏收藏1 收藏收藏1
28#
发表于 2012-11-13 12:19:46 | 只看该作者
不对。
题目说  SpendLess (discount store) 把其他discount store 都挤走了。
          接着说: 店铺不会vacant (暗示discount or non discount store 加入)
          结论:Closon's (non-discount store) 一来那些新开的店全部关门。 (暗示了新开的都是non-discount                  
          是竞争不过同样是non discount 的Closon's)

消弱: B: 在Closon's 开张之后,驻扎在这条街的 discount store 增加了(不是结论所暗示的non discount) 。(新开的discount store 跟 closon‘s 没竞争关系 它们的关门其实不是因为Closon's 导致的,反而是因为SpendLess导致的)
27#
发表于 2012-10-4 03:24:39 | 只看该作者
我觉得这道题重点是抓对主干,不然就很迷糊。原来是问哪种情况使“those locations will not stay vacant for long”这个结论weaken. 哎!!
26#
发表于 2012-8-14 14:29:02 | 只看该作者
这道题纠结了两天,原来是这么回事,没想到错位经营这么个概念,谢谢楼上的回答!OG 从100往后确实难多了。
25#
发表于 2011-8-17 17:55:32 | 只看该作者
原来这个those locations will not stay vacant for long 是结论句啊
-- by 会员 yuantengxuanwu (2011/8/13 10:50:19)



住:
24#
发表于 2011-8-17 17:54:57 | 只看该作者
我觉得这才是我和大部分人的最大问题!!!说得清楚!另外,怎么得到正真的结论呢?在这个题里,就是抓主干!!!只留下主谓宾就是了!这个办法有时候语法也好用!
23#
发表于 2011-8-13 10:50:19 | 只看该作者
原来这个those locations will not stay vacant for long 是结论句啊
Léo 该用户已被删除
22#
发表于 2011-8-9 23:11:35 | 只看该作者
提示: 作者被禁止或删除 内容自动屏蔽
21#
发表于 2011-5-31 22:58:58 | 只看该作者
顶起来  大家在讨论讨论吧。。
20#
发表于 2011-5-31 22:55:32 | 只看该作者
不明白啊!!! wont be vacant for too long 为什么能被削弱了 只是来了不行被赶走不就行了么  新厂商该入驻还是入驻啊!!! 疯了疯了
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-10-23 05:08
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部