ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2895|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG Vrbal Review 2nd Edition CR 4 求解释

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-10-3 17:20:55 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |正序浏览 |阅读模式
4. The price the government pays for standard weapons purchased from military contractors is deternmined by a pricing  method called "historical costing". Historical costing allows contractors to protect their profits by adding a percentage increase, based on tne current rate of inflation, to the previous year's contractual price.
Which of the following satements,if true,is the best basis form a criticism of historical costing as an economically sound pricing method for military contracts?
A.The government might continue to pay for  past  inefficient use of funds.
B.The rate of inflation has varied considerably over the past twenty years.
C.The contractual price will be greatly affected by the cost of materials used for the products.
D.Many taxpayers question the amount of money the government spends on military contracts.
E.The pricing method based on  historical costing might not encourage the development of innovative weapons.

这题的正确答案选A, 但我认为B和C都可以。先说B, 我认为提干里说只在往年的合同价格上加而不减,那么某年通货紧缩就也inefficient. 然后C,如果通胀率不变,但制造武器的原材料价格上涨则也无法通过该定价方式的补偿。
希望各位帮我解释一下,纠正我的一些推理错误,非常感谢了~~~
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
5#
发表于 2011-9-28 00:14:04 | 只看该作者
“如果通胀率不变,但制造武器的原材料价格上涨则也无法通过该定价方式的补偿。”
我不这么想哦,因为CONTRACT的定价方式是基础定价加上INFLATION,所以The contractual price will be greatly affected by the cost of materials used for the products是错的
地板
发表于 2010-10-5 10:15:38 | 只看该作者
你想的可真多。通缩的时候就加一个负值呗
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2010-10-5 09:43:37 | 只看该作者
每日一求。。。
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2010-10-4 12:01:37 | 只看该作者
求解释啊
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-17 22:37
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部