ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Bank depositors in the United States are all financially protected against bank failure because the government insures all individuals' bank deposits. An economist argues that this insurance is partly responsible for the high rate of bank failures, since it removes from depositors any financial incentive to find out whether the bank that holds their money is secure against failure. If depositors were more selective.then banks would need to be secure in order to compete for depositors' money.

The economist's argument makes which of the following assumptions?

正确答案: E

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 4004|回复: 6
打印 上一主题 下一主题

prep cr1 66

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-9-20 10:59:39 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |正序浏览 |阅读模式
66.(35089-!-item-!-188;#058&007596)



Bank depositors in the United States are all financially protected against bank failure because the government insures all individuals' bank deposits.  An economist argues that this insurance is partly responsible for the high rate of bank failures, since it removes from depositors any financial incentive to find out whether the bank that holds their money is secure against failure.  If depositors were more selective, then banks would need to be secure in order to compete for depositors' money.



The economist's argument makes which of the following assumptions?



(A) Bank failures are caused when big borrowers default on loan repayments.

(B) A significant proportion of depositors maintain accounts at several different banks.

(C) The more a depositor has to deposit, the more careful he or she tends to be in selecting a bank.

(D) The difference in the interest rates paid to depositors by different banks is not a significant factor in bank failures.

(E) Potential depositors are able to determine which banks are secure against failure.
答案是E。我认为D也可以做假设啊,D否定了其他可能的原因啊,所以也相当于假设了。
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
7#
发表于 2014-4-29 11:56:31 | 只看该作者
B为什么不对呢,跪求解答啊
6#
发表于 2010-10-21 20:28:31 | 只看该作者
并不是所有的assumption题的正解都是 not + weaken 形式,
两种假定: 1. 填补一个原文中的gap,将原文结论中的新信息和前提的重要信息联系起来
          2. 反对一个可能会削弱原文的 意见,也就是常用的“not + weaken”
5#
发表于 2010-10-19 11:30:23 | 只看该作者
今天又看这个,其实我觉得这个选D比E好。。汗。。
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2010-9-20 13:42:29 | 只看该作者
66.(35089-!-item-!-188;#058&007596)



Bank depositors in the United States are all financially protected against bank failure because the government insures all individuals' bank deposits.  An economist argues that this insurance is partly responsible for the high rate of bank failures, since it removes from depositors any financial incentive to find out whether the bank that holds their money is secure against failure.  If depositors were more selective, then banks would need to be secure in order to compete for depositors' money.



The economist's argument makes which of the following assumptions?



(A) Bank failures are caused when big borrowers default on loan repayments.

(B) A significant proportion of depositors maintain accounts at several different banks.

(C) The more a depositor has to deposit, the more careful he or she tends to be in selecting a bank.

(D) The difference in the interest rates paid to depositors by different banks is not a significant factor in bank failures.

(E) Potential depositors are able to determine which banks are secure against failure.
答案是E。我认为D也可以做假设啊,D否定了其他可能的原因啊,所以也相当于假设了。
-- by 会员 Christianyang (2010/9/20 10:59:39)





this insurance is partly responsible for the high rate of bank failures  一定程度上认为是insurance的原因
却并没有否定 The difference interest rates paid to depositors 不是一个关键因素


你同意D就好像下面这个逻辑:
"我认为A很重要。"
你得出我的假设是"我认为B不重要"


-- by 会员 aomeisoft7 (2010/9/20 11:56:21)


我知道E对。新东方老师给假设题的思路是否定可以削弱的原因,我就选了D了。我现在认为问题是出在那个significant上,取非的话不能完全否定。
板凳
发表于 2010-9-20 11:58:07 | 只看该作者
这道题从头到尾没提到interest rate,怎么会是assumption?

OG解释如下: In arguing about choosing banks, the economist mentions nothing about the relation of interest rates to bank failures, so this statement is not assumed.



即使 the economist做了这个假设,那是不是还得假设inflation也无关、银行服务也无关、exchange rate也无关……?
沙发
发表于 2010-9-20 11:56:21 | 只看该作者
66.(35089-!-item-!-188;#058&007596)



Bank depositors in the United States are all financially protected against bank failure because the government insures all individuals' bank deposits.  An economist argues that this insurance is partly responsible for the high rate of bank failures, since it removes from depositors any financial incentive to find out whether the bank that holds their money is secure against failure.  If depositors were more selective, then banks would need to be secure in order to compete for depositors' money.



The economist's argument makes which of the following assumptions?



(A) Bank failures are caused when big borrowers default on loan repayments.

(B) A significant proportion of depositors maintain accounts at several different banks.

(C) The more a depositor has to deposit, the more careful he or she tends to be in selecting a bank.

(D) The difference in the interest rates paid to depositors by different banks is not a significant factor in bank failures.

(E) Potential depositors are able to determine which banks are secure against failure.
答案是E。我认为D也可以做假设啊,D否定了其他可能的原因啊,所以也相当于假设了。
-- by 会员 Christianyang (2010/9/20 10:59:39)



this insurance is partly responsible for the high rate of bank failures  一定程度上认为是insurance的原因
却并没有否定 The difference interest rates paid to depositors 不是一个关键因素


你同意D就好像下面这个逻辑:
"我认为A很重要。"
你得出我的假设是"我认为B不重要"


您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-10-4 16:24
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部