请教GWD-29-Q8，搜索不到讨论答案

多多猪头6

GWD-29-Q8

Which of the following, if true, provides evidence that most logically completes the argument below?

According to a widely held economic hypothesis, imposing strict environmental regulations reduces economic growth.This hypothesis is undermined by the fact that the states with the strictest environmental regulations also have the highest

economic growth.This fact does not show that environmental regulations promote growth, however, since ___
A.those states with the strictest environmental regulations invest the most in education and job training

B.even those states that have only moderately strict environmental regulations have higher growth than those with the least-strict regulations

C.many states that are experiencing reduced economic growth are considering weakening their environmental regulations

D.after introducing stricter environmental regulations, many states experienced increased economic growth

E.even those states with very weak environmental regulations have experienced at least some growth

GWD答案是a, 我选的C。
根据逆否命题，如果正在经历经济增长率减少的国家正在考虑削弱他们的环境管制可以推出增强环境管制就可以提高这些国家的经济增长率。为什么C不对呢？A的话好像他因的也说不过去啊。大家来讨论一下。

Blossomair

我认为，前面所有都只是陈述，和问题本身关系不大（把题目读懂以后才能发现这点），我们可以把问题理解为environmental regulations 降低 growth或者environmental regulations与promote growth没有什么关系，纵观五个选项，能够回答问题的只有A，即只是那些有严格环境保护限制的地区是把大部分的资源投入到教育和工作技能培训上，包含了environmental regulations与promote growth没有什么关系。

cutemushroom

those states with the strictest environmental regulations invest the most in education and job training因为教育，职业培训和环境污染没什么关系，所以不管这些州的环境法严不严都不会影响经济增长
不知道可不可以这样理解

红红的云

转一个老外网站的解释：
My answer is A.

Argument : Environmental regulations [ inversely propertional to ] economic growth.

Exception : Some states have strict Environment regulations, yet strong economic growth.

Author defends : It doesn't refute the hypothesis because these states had some other reason to fuel their economic growth.

Reason :
A. those states with the strictest environmental regulations invest the most in education and job training

jbc88

怎么我觉得是e呢？ 意思：即使许多没有强制环保的state也能保证经济的增长，也就是环保不是促进经济增长的因素

-- by 会员 tanglang0921 (2010/9/17 22:34:00)

我也是，求达人帮我

terryisakid

看了各方讨论帖，感觉上做错的原因是忽视了since的意思~

忘了你

你的逆否错了。是considering.意思就是说经济下降，是因为管制太紧了，要放松管制，以促进经济。逆否是如果放松管制，经济就不会下行。还是选A好，他因排除。我跟你错的一样哈，改一下就行啦！

tanglang0921

怎么我觉得是e呢？ 意思：即使许多没有强制环保的state也能保证经济的增长，也就是环保不是促进经济增长的因素

sallyruru

那弱弱的问一下...

A可不可以这样理解呢？：
those states with the strictest environmental regulations invest in education and job training，而这些education和job training 都是与环境保护相关的，就是说还是由于环境控制promote economic growth...?

如果是这样的话还是解释不了啊？

-- by 会员 mandyliang7 (2010/8/11 10:21:58)

既然题目没有说这些education与环保有关，我们似乎没有必要想太多吧~

mandyliang7

那弱弱的问一下...

A可不可以这样理解呢？：
those states with the strictest environmental regulations invest in education and job training，而这些education和job training 都是与环境保护相关的，就是说还是由于环境控制promote economic growth...?

如果是这样的话还是解释不了啊？