ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 5195|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

请教GWD7-Q27

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-7-7 14:00:15 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |正序浏览 |阅读模式
A significant number of complex repair jobs carried out by Ace Repairs have to be reworked under the company’s warranty.The reworked jobs are invariably satisfactory.When initial repairs are inadequate, therefore, it is not because the mechanics lack competence; rather, there is clearly a level of focused concentration that complex repairs require that is elicited more reliably by rework jobs than by first-time jobs.



The argument above assumes which of the following?



A.There is no systematic difference in membership between the group of mechanics who do first-time jobs and the group of those who do rework jobs.

B.There is no company that successfully competes with Ace Repairs for complex repair jobs.

C.Ace Repairs’ warranty is good on first-time jobs but does not cover rework jobs.

D.Ace Repairs does not in any way penalize mechanics who have worked on complex repair jobs that later had to be reworked.

E.There is no category of repair jobs in which Ace Repairs invariably carries out first-time jobs satisfactorily.
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2010-8-4 22:16:58 | 只看该作者
结论说 是因为2修的人注意力要求比较高 导致重修的比较好
排除他因  A说 不是因为修理工这两拨人有啥不同
正好
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-2 04:04
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部