ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 6386|回复: 8
打印 上一主题 下一主题

清华INSEAD EMBA vs. Chicago Booth EMBA

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-4-7 14:44:21 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |正序浏览 |阅读模式
请教各位前辈:

我拿到了南洋商学院(NTU) MBA, Tsinghua INSEAD EMBA 和Chicago Booth EMBA 的OFFER。

请教各位前辈,Tsinghua INSEAD EMBA (singapore)  比 BOOTH EMBA (singapore)  如何?

背景: Study and work in Singapore 14 years.
目标: 1. 在国内和亚太 创业
         2. 如果创业失败, 在国内和亚太 Consultanting 公司工作

多谢各位指教。
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
9#
 楼主| 发表于 2010-4-14 10:28:16 | 只看该作者
Thank for your valuable inputs. I probably should just apply a INSEAD MBA program in Fontainebleau.
8#
 楼主| 发表于 2010-4-9 09:37:40 | 只看该作者
Someone told me that Booth brand is better in N. America, Europe, Asia and even China than Tsinghus/INSEAD. Do you agree?
7#
 楼主| 发表于 2010-4-8 14:35:32 | 只看该作者
thanks
6#
发表于 2010-4-8 13:22:27 | 只看该作者
如果你要创业的话,选择就近market的地方读书比较好
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2010-4-8 13:22:00 | 只看该作者
各位前辈:
我再追加点资料。请各位指教

Chicago Booth EMBA (Asia) has 15 classes in Singapore, 3 classes in Chicago/London. Tsinghua-INSEAD EMBA has 6 classes in Beijing, 3 classes in Singapore, and 2 in Dubai/France. Can you please give me some advice which MBA probably is the best choice if you were in my shoes? Your inputs are very important to me.

Some background about me: I am from China and have studied (B.Eng and M.Eng) and worked in Singapore for about 15 years in high tech R&D sector till now.

Here are my goals after graduation:

1. I plan to start up a high tech company based in China and Asia in 5 years.

2. If my start-up failed, I want to join a high tech company as director in China/Asia. If not possible, I may want to join a consultant company to work on management consultation in China/Singapore/Asia.

3. One thing I am clear. EMBA is not for switching field drastically. So I am unlikely to go into Finace sector.

Some of my thoughts:

1. For China network: it seems Tsinghua-INSEAD is better.

2. For branding, Chicago Booth has a better teaching faculty and 50 years history (while Tsinghua-INSEAD joined program is just 4 year old). Tsinghua EMBA is top in China but it is not known internationally. So the Tsinghua-INSEAD program is a bit riskier.

3, INSEAD and Chicago have the similar ranking (about top 5 in the world) in the MBA and EMBA categories.

4. I heard that the following comments on INSEAD vs Booth. Do you agree with them?

Entrepreneurship: INSEAD better;
Consulting/general management: INSEAD better;
International brand: Booth better; (but in China/Singapore Tsinghua-INSEAD’s brand is better)
Teaching: Booth better;
Finance: Booth better.
International network: INSEAD better

4. One thing in common, I will be bankrupt after either school (Tsinghua-INSEAD S$120,000, Chicago S$170,000). : P

Please shed some lights on it. I am looking forward to your advices. Thanks a lot.
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2010-4-8 13:19:48 | 只看该作者
Hi 慕容小强,
Why Remove Tsinghua is better?
So I should just study a INSEAD EMBA? Any reasons? Tsinghua network might be useful, right?
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2010-4-7 15:37:34 | 只看该作者

清华 EMBA

我对清华 EMBA 了解不多。请各位多指点。
不过INSEAD 把清华INSEAD EMBA 当作一个CHINA focus 的项目。
沙发
发表于 2010-4-7 15:06:03 | 只看该作者
EMBA的工作级别通常高出MBA一大截,但同时平均年龄也大出一截。顶起来,看有人了解没,如果都在新加坡读,INSEAD前边不用加Tsinghua可能对你还更有用。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册


近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-29 12:31
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部