ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1560|回复: 5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

【大家一起来看一些GWD 一道题~~谢谢!~】

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-2-24 14:52:41 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |正序浏览 |阅读模式
T-9-Q33.
Which of the following, if true, most logically completes the passage?

A recent poll found that over 80 percent of the residents of Nalmed Province favored a massive expansion of the commuter rail system as a means of significantly easing congestion on the province’s highways and were willing to help pay for the expansion through an increase in their taxes. Nevertheless, the poll results indicate that expansion of the rail system, if successfully completed, would be unlikely to achieve its goal of easing congestion, because.

A.most of people in favor of expanding the rail system reported less congestion during their highway commute as the primary benefit they would experience.

B.of the less than 20 percent of residents not counted as favoring the expansion, about half claimed to have no opinion one way or the other.

C.the twice-daily periods of peak congestion caused by people commuting in cars have grown from about an hour each to almost two and a half hours each in the past 20 years.

D.expanding the commuter rail system will require the construction of dozens of miles of new railroads.

E.the proposed expansion to the commuter rail system will make it possible for some people who both live and work at suburban locations to commute by rail.




答案选A唉~~我选了c~~十分奇怪的一点,A 的意思就是说 expansion of the rail way 并不是人们的primary benefit,所以修路不能达到预期的结果,但是不是primary benefit又怎样?。。。。只要能减少congestion就可以啦?这个选项没有直接反驳这一点啊?。。。。C选项我认为直接反驳了这一点,拥挤增加,并没有减少~~
请大家一起来讨论下~~谢谢!~~
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
6#
 楼主| 发表于 2010-3-7 16:43:34 | 只看该作者
根据排除法只能选A了,C是明显不对的,既然交通堵塞情况很严重,那么这项计划就能缓解这种情况,从而达到ease congestion的目的
而A说,本来交通堵塞情况就不是很严重,那么花了大价钱扩大公路系统所起的作用也是微乎其微了
逻辑这个东西,有时是说不清为什么对的,但是错的很明显
排除BCDE也就可以放心地选A了
-- by 会员 dengyichao (2010/2/25 11:01:11)



http://edu.taisha.org/bbs/thread-998555-1-1.html
参考下这个解释~
呵呵~谢谢咯~
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2010-3-4 15:14:59 | 只看该作者
根据排除法只能选A了,C是明显不对的,既然交通堵塞情况很严重,那么这项计划就能缓解这种情况,从而达到ease congestion的目的
而A说,本来交通堵塞情况就不是很严重,那么花了大价钱扩大公路系统所起的作用也是微乎其微了
逻辑这个东西,有时是说不清为什么对的,但是错的很明显
排除BCDE也就可以放心地选A了
-- by 会员 dengyichao (2010/2/25 11:01:11)





不好意思。。。。。回帖太晚了。。。
重新看了一遍题目,觉得C的错误是不是在于它这种情况已经被考虑进改造铁路的结果进去了?
而A,我想请教一下A选项:most of people in favor of expanding the rail system reported less congestion during their highway commute as the primary benefit they would experience. 要如何理解?
地板
发表于 2010-2-25 11:01:11 | 只看该作者
根据排除法只能选A了,C是明显不对的,既然交通堵塞情况很严重,那么这项计划就能缓解这种情况,从而达到ease congestion的目的
而A说,本来交通堵塞情况就不是很严重,那么花了大价钱扩大公路系统所起的作用也是微乎其微了
逻辑这个东西,有时是说不清为什么对的,但是错的很明显
排除BCDE也就可以放心地选A了
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2010-2-24 18:01:02 | 只看该作者
帮帮忙~
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2010-2-24 14:54:10 | 只看该作者
顶~~~
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-10 08:43
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部