- UID
- 509989
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2010-2-9
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
Q3 to Q6:
Extensive research has shown
that the effects of short-term price promotions on sales are themselves Lineshort-term.Companies’ hopes that (5)promotions might have a positive aftereffect have not been borne out for reasons that researchers have been able to identify.A price promotion entices only a brand’s (10)long-term or “loyal” customers; people seldom buy an unfamiliar brand merely because the price is reduced.They simply avoid paying more than they have to when one of (15)their customary brands is temporar- ily available at a reduced price.A price promotion does not increase the number of long-term customers of a brand, as it attracts virtually (20)no new customers in the first place. Nor do price promotions have linger- ing aftereffects for a brand, even negative ones such as damage to a brand’s reputation or erosion of (25)customer loyalty, as is often feared. So why do companies spend so much on price promotions?Clearly price promotions are generally run at a loss, otherwise there would (30)be more of them.And the bigger the increase in sales at promotion prices, the bigger the loss.While short-term price promotions can have legitimate uses, such as (35)reducing excess inventory, it is the recognizable increase in sales that is their main attraction to manage- ment, which is therefore reluctant to abandon this strategy despite its effect on the bottom line. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The passage suggests that evidence for price promotions’ “effect on the bottom line” (line 40) is provided by
- the lack of lingering aftereffects from price promotions
- the frequency with which price promotions occur
- price promotions’ inability to attract new customers
- price promotions’ recognizable effect on sales
- the legitimate uses to which management can put price promotions
Answer: B 请问这题为什么是B呢?找来找去都看不到答案。。谢谢 |
|