ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2807|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

费费逻辑求解

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-2-2 10:12:41 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |正序浏览 |阅读模式
82. Every photograph, because it involves the light rays that something emits hitting film, must in some obvious sense be true. But because it could always have been made to show things differently than it does, it cannot express the whole truth and, in that sense, is false. Therefore, nothing can ever be definitively proved with a photograph.



Which one of the following is an assumption that would permit the conclusion above to be properly drawn?



A. Whatever is false in the sense that it cannot express the whole truth cannot furnish definitive proof.

B. The whole truth cannot be known.

C. It is not possible to determine the truthfulness of a photograph in any sense.

D. It is possible to use a photograph as corroborative evidence if there is additional evidence establishing the truth about the scene photographed.

E. If something is being photographed, then it is possible to prove definitively the truth about it.

这题逻辑题,看的我云里雾里,请大家帮我解析下

谢谢
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
板凳
发表于 2010-2-3 22:57:01 | 只看该作者
IMO:A
原文最后论述了:相片是假的,所以,相片不能作证据
选项A正好弥补了逻辑链中间的空白,ie,假的不能作为证据
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2010-2-3 12:08:22 | 只看该作者
兄弟姐妹们,帮下忙啊
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-10-21 17:39
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部