ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1468|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

请教一道kaplan得逻辑踢

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-1-22 06:03:09 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |正序浏览 |阅读模式
A psychologist is treating a patient with multiple personality disorder. One of the patient ’ s personalities claims to be a blind Civil War veteran. When exhibiting this personality, the patient responds in the affirmative when asked, only in a written format, whether he is blind. None of the patient ’ s other personalities claims to be blind. The psychologist concluded that the patient ’ s personality is fragmented, and that the veteran personality claims to be blind, while another personality responds to the written question.
Asking which of the following questions can reveal a flaw in the psychologist ’ s explanation?
 
    1.Why does the personality that answers the written question not answer “ No ” ?
 
    2.Why does the psychologist feel compelled to explain the patient ’ s responses?
 
    3.Why doesn ’ t another of the patient ’ s personalities convince the veteran personality that he can see?
 
    4.Why does the veteran personality claim to be blind, but none of the other personalities make this claim?
 
    5.Why don ’ t all the patient ’ s personalities claim to be blind?


正确答案是1

我没看懂得地方是When exhibiting this personality, the patient responds in the affirmative when asked, only in a written format, whether he is blind. 这句话什么意思阿?谢谢!
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2010-1-23 00:35:55 | 只看该作者
如果这为病人选的是No,那么表示他当时并不出在越南老兵的状态中。。是某种其他的人格在作答。所以1对。
lZ问的这句话的意思是:
当该病人显现出该人格并用书面的形式被问及他是否是盲人是。他的回答是肯定的。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-10-2 02:49
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部