ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 4939|回复: 10
打印 上一主题 下一主题

看看大家有多少会上这道题选项的当Ozone - Amphibian populations

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2009-12-27 21:50:05 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |正序浏览 |阅读模式
Amphibian populations are declining in numbers worldwide. Not coincidentally, the earth's ozone layer has been continuously depleted throughout the last 50 years. Atmospheric ozone blocks UV-B, a type of ultraviolet radiation that is continuously produced by the sun, and which can damage genes. Because amphibians lack hair, hide, or feathers to shield them, they are particularly vulunerable to UV-B radiation. In addition, their relatinous eggs lack the protection of leathery or hard shells, Thus, the primary cause of the declining amphibian population is the depletion of the ozone layer.

Each of the following, if true, would strengthen the argument EXCEPT:

A. Of the various types of radiation blocked by atmospheric ozone, UV-B is the only type that can damage genes.

B. Amphibian populations are declining far more rapidly than are the populations of nonamphibian species whose tissues and eggs have more natural protection from UV-B.

C. Atmospheric ozone has been significantly depleted above all the areas of the world in which amphibian populations are declining.

D. The natural habitat of amphibians has not become smaller over the past century.

E. Amphibian populations have declined continuously for the last 50 years.
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
11#
发表于 2012-12-31 08:53:30 | 只看该作者
今天我也做到这道题,答案说是D,应该是A。原因:A说在被臭氧block的射线中UV是唯一损害基因的。无论将A取非与否,结论都能成立(就算UV不是唯一的损害基因辐射,就算还有100种其他损害基因的辐射,它们都会被臭氧过滤掉的。所以臭氧层的损害导致此动物的减少)


D说栖息地没减少,说明动物减少不是由于环境的恶化造成的,D排除了一个可能,侧面support了另一个可能。
10#
发表于 2012-4-12 15:32:32 | 只看该作者
做费费逻辑,里面给的答案竟然是D!死活想不通,我自己做的是A………………
9#
发表于 2009-12-29 13:12:53 | 只看该作者
如果原文的结论是uv-b射线造成了amphibian的数量减少,那么A就是加强。但文中是o-zone跟amphibian的关系
8#
发表于 2009-12-29 02:11:55 | 只看该作者
A既不增强也不削弱,它没有提供任何新信息,只是对已有信息进行说明
其他选项要么引入了将Amphibian数量的减少和UV-B/Ozone关联的新信息(BCE),要么排除了Amphibian数量减少和其他因素有关的可能性(D)
7#
发表于 2009-12-28 21:36:42 | 只看该作者
的确很有迷惑性,真是设计得非常好的一道题目!
“Of the various types of radiation blocked by atmospheric ozone, UV-B is the only type that can damage genes.”

可以这么理解:如果OZONE阻止的射线中,除了UV-B,还有10000种射线,都可以伤害gene的话,这加强了还是削弱了argument?
我直觉是:加强了argument。
所以,如果说只有一种UV-B的话,那反而是削弱了argument
6#
发表于 2009-12-28 15:55:55 | 只看该作者
没看到解释,只是在Google里搜到答案是A。标红的是我弄的。
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2009-12-28 14:50:08 | 只看该作者
啊哦,虽然选择A是正确的,可得出选A的逻辑感觉像在猜。 prayer 你是在哪里看到的BCDE的这种解释?

Amphibian populations are declining in numbers worldwide. Not coincidentally, the earth's ozone layer has been continuously depleted throughout the last 50 years. Atmospheric ozone blocks UV-B, a type of ultraviolet radiation that is continuously produced by the sun, and which can damage genes. Because amphibians lack hair, hide, or feathers to shield them, they are particularly vulunerable to UV-B radiation. In addition, their relatinous eggs lack the protection of leathery or hard shells, Thus, the primary cause of the declining amphibian population is the depletion of the ozone layer.

Each of the following, if true, would strengthen the argument EXCEPT:

A. Of the various types of radiation blocked by atmospheric ozone, UV-B is the only type that can damage genes.

B. Amphibian populations are declining far more rapidly than are the populations of nonamphibian species whose tissues and eggs have more natural protection from UV-B.

C. Atmospheric ozone has been significantly depleted above all the areas of the world in which amphibian populations are declining.

D. The natural habitat of amphibians has not become smaller over the past century.

E. Amphibian populations have declined continuously for the last 50 years.
-- by 会员 blvicky (2009/12/27 21:50:05)



BCDE都跟原文由相关联的。

A的,取非,对原文不加强也不削弱,只是重复了原文的意思
-- by 会员 prayer (2009/12/28 12:24:08)
地板
发表于 2009-12-28 12:24:08 | 只看该作者
Amphibian populations are declining in numbers worldwide. Not coincidentally, the earth's ozone layer has been continuously depleted throughout the last 50 years. Atmospheric ozone blocks UV-B, a type of ultraviolet radiation that is continuously produced by the sun, and which can damage genes. Because amphibians lack hair, hide, or feathers to shield them, they are particularly vulunerable to UV-B radiation. In addition, their relatinous eggs lack the protection of leathery or hard shells, Thus, the primary cause of the declining amphibian population is the depletion of the ozone layer.

Each of the following, if true, would strengthen the argument EXCEPT:

A. Of the various types of radiation blocked by atmospheric ozone, UV-B is the only type that can damage genes.

B. Amphibian populations are declining far more rapidly than are the populations of nonamphibian species whose tissues and eggs have more natural protection from UV-B.

C. Atmospheric ozone has been significantly depleted above all the areas of the world in which amphibian populations are declining.

D. The natural habitat of amphibians has not become smaller over the past century.

E. Amphibian populations have declined continuously for the last 50 years.
-- by 会员 blvicky (2009/12/27 21:50:05)



BCDE都跟原文由相关联的。

A的,取非,对原文不加强也不削弱,只是重复了原文的意思
板凳
发表于 2009-12-28 09:59:36 | 只看该作者
查了一下,答案是A,再琢磨一下去
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-5 12:44
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部