ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 4388|回复: 11
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD-TN-14 Q19 请大家帮忙解答

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2009-11-24 20:06:20 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |正序浏览 |阅读模式
Some species of Arctic birds are threatened by recent sharp increases in the population of snow geese, which breed in the Arctic and are displacing birds of less vigorous species.  Although snow geese are a popular quarry for hunters in the southern regions where they winter, the hunting season ends if and when hunting has reduced the population by five percent, according to official estimates.  Clearly, dropping this restriction would allow the other species to recover.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the argument?

A.    Hunting limits for snow geese were imposed many years ago in response to a sharp decline in the population of snow geese.
B.    It has been many years since the restriction led to the hunting season for snow geese being closed earlier than the scheduled date.
C.    The number of snow geese taken by hunters each year has grown every year for several years.
D.    As their population has increased, snow geese have recolonized wintering grounds that they had not used for several seasons.
E.    In the snow goose’s winter habitats, the goose faces no significant natural predation.
答案选B为什么我觉得B是support了呢
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
12#
发表于 2011-9-20 19:18:41 | 只看该作者
the hunting season ends if and when hunting has reduced the population by five percent, according to official estimates这个restriction的作用是在snow geese被打猎到降低5%数量时停止打猎期
C.The number of snow geese taken by hunters each year has grown every year for several years.这项说猎人能达到的snow geese的数量连续几年增长,说明5%对应的数字在增长,乘数变大,说明即使有5%的restriction时snow geese数量也在增长啊,从而undermine
11#
发表于 2009-12-8 00:07:42 | 只看该作者
原文论点: 放弃这项限制将有助于其他生物存活
论据:这个限制是决定打猎季节终止的标志,也就是正因为有这个限制,打猎才收到限制
题目问:哪个削弱了。。也就是。这个限制对于真正的打猎时间是没有作用的。。。
B其实是一个语法问题。。。举个例子说 it has been a long time since we met each other last time...是说我们好久都没见面了。。B说的是。。。自从限制对打猎时间的控制还生效的。。。已经很久了。。也就是。。限制对打猎时间的终止没有影响。。已经很久了。。
10#
发表于 2009-12-7 23:49:24 | 只看该作者
It has been many years since the restriction led to the hunting season for snow geese being closed earlier than the scheduled date.
-------
led to表明了很多年以前restriction就已经不再导致狩猎期提前结束了。
9#
发表于 2009-12-1 22:38:45 | 只看该作者
还是不明白。。。这道题我也错了   现在的论点是要取消这一狩猎限制啊
8#
发表于 2009-12-1 22:01:18 | 只看该作者
drop this restriction 应该是放弃这一限制吧,这样的话,B怎么就weaken了呢?
7#
 楼主| 发表于 2009-11-28 13:09:26 | 只看该作者
[quote]
B.    It has been many years since the restriction led to the hunting season for snow geese being closed earlier than the scheduled date.
B是说这个blabla...的限制已经实施很多年了。

那么当一个人说为了要让其他生物生存,应该要实施这个限制啊!另一个人说这个限制已经实施很多年了啊!这时,你的相信度啊会降低点呢?是就说明削弱了。。

我讲的不太清楚,请Lz见谅啊!。。。
-- by 会员 仙蒂瑞拉 (2009/11/27 23:04:07)



好的我懂了谢谢
6#
 楼主| 发表于 2009-11-28 13:06:39 | 只看该作者
B.    It has been many years since the restriction led to the hunting season for snow geese being closed earlier than the scheduled date.
B是说这个blabla...的限制已经实施很多年了。

那么当一个人说为了要让其他生物生存,应该要实施这个限制啊!另一个人说这个限制已经实施很多年了啊!这时,你的相信度啊会降低点呢?是就说明削弱了。。

我讲的不太清楚,请Lz见谅啊!。。。
-- by 会员 仙蒂瑞拉 (2009/11/27 23:04:07)



题目貌似不是这个意思啊,题目好像是说这个限制导致打猎季节提前结束了,所以为了让geese数量下降我们应该放弃这个限制法案,而B个人感觉就是对题目意思的重复啊,哪里削弱了
5#
发表于 2009-11-27 23:04:07 | 只看该作者
B.    It has been many years since the restriction led to the hunting season for snow geese being closed earlier than the scheduled date.
B是说这个blabla...的限制已经实施很多年了。

那么当一个人说为了要让其他生物生存,应该要实施这个限制啊!另一个人说这个限制已经实施很多年了啊!这时,你的相信度啊会降低点呢?是就说明削弱了。。

我讲的不太清楚,请Lz见谅啊!。。。
地板
发表于 2009-11-27 22:17:10 | 只看该作者
这题很有意思,b里面用的是led把意思完全一反。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-2-11 14:02
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部