- UID
- 480549
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2009-10-9
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
Frazier and Mosteller assert that
medical research could be improved by
a move toward larger, simpler clinical
Line trials of medical treatments. Currently,
(5) researchers collect far more background
information on patients than is strictly
required for their trials—substantially more
than hospitals collect—thereby escalating
costs of data collection, storage, and
(10) analysis. Although limiting information
collection could increase the risk that
researchers will overlook facts relevant
to a study, Frazier and Mosteller contend
that such risk, never entirely eliminable
(15) from research, would still be small in most
studies. Only in research on entirely new
treatments are new and unexpected vari-
ables likely to arise.
Frazier and Mosteller propose not
(20) only that researchers limit data collec-
tion on individual patients but also that
researchers enroll more patients in clinical
trials, thereby obtaining a more represen-
tative sample of the total population with
(25) the disease under study. Often research-
ers restrict study participation to patients
who have no ailments besides those being
studied. A treatment judged successful
under these ideal conditions can then
(30) be evaluated under normal conditions.
Broadening the range of trial participants,
Frazier and Mosteller suggest, would
enable researchers to evaluate a treat-
ment’s efficacy for diverse patients under
(35) various conditions and to evaluate its
effectiveness for different patient sub-
groups. For example, the value of a
treatment for a progressive disease may
vary according to a patient’s stage of
(40) disease.   atients’ ages may also affect
a treatment’s efficacy.
Q4:
According to the passage, Frazier and Mosteller believe which of the following about medical research?
- It is seriously flawed as presently conducted because researchers overlook facts that are relevant to the subject of their research.
- It tends to benefit certain subgroups of patients disproportionately.
- It routinely reveals new variables in research on entirely new treatments.
- It can be made more accurate by limiting the amount of information researchers collect.
- It cannot be freed of the risk that significant variables may be overlooked.
答案是E,我选的C。 我觉得E里面的significant文中完全没有提到啊?
[bgcolor=yellow]The system of patent- [/bgcolor] granting, which confers
temporary monopolies for
Line the exploitation of new tech-
(5) nologies, was originally
established as an incentive
to the pursuit of risky new
ideas. Yet studies of the
most patent-conscious
(10) business of all—the semi-
conductor industry—suggest
that firms do not necessarily
become more innovative as
they increase their patenting
(15) activity. Ziedonis and Hall,
for example, found that
investment in research and
development (a reasonable
proxy for innovation) did
(20) not substantially increase
between 1982 and 1992,
the industry’s most feverish
period of patenting. Instead,
semiconductor firms simply
(25) squeezed more patents out
of existing research and
development expenditures.
Moreover, Ziedonis and
Hall found that as patenting
(30) activity at semiconductor
firms increased in the
1980’s, the consensus
among industry employees
was that the average quality
(35) of their firms’ patents
declined. Though patent
quality is a difficult notion
to measure, the number of
times a patent is cited in
(40) the technical literature is
a reasonable yardstick, and
citations per semiconductor
patent did decline during
the 1980’s. This decline in
(45) quality may be related to
changes in the way semi-
conductor firms managed
their patenting process:
rather than patenting to win
(50) exclusive rights to a valuable
new technology, patents
were filed more for strategic
purposes, to be used as
bargaining chips to ward
(55) off infringement suites or
as a means to block
competitors’ products.
The passage is primarily concerned with discussing
- a study suggesting that the semiconductor industry’s approach to patenting during the period from 1982 to 1992 yielded unanticipated results
- a study of the semiconductor industry during the period from 1982 to 1992 that advocates certain changes in the industry’s management of the patenting process
- the connection between patenting and innovation in the semiconductor industry during the period from 1982 to 1992
- reasons that investment in research and development in the semiconductor industry did not increase significantly during the period from 1982 to 1992
- certain factors that made the period from 1982 to 1992 a time of intense patenting activity in the semiconductor industry
答案是A,我选的C,我觉得C更精确,说明了“innovation”。
请NN们点拨一下,谢谢! |
|