ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1661|回复: 0
打印 上一主题 下一主题

CXD P203-93

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2009-11-14 14:23:55 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |正序浏览 |阅读模式
Samples from the floor of a rock shelter in Pennsylvania were dated by analyzing the carbon they contained. The dates assigned to samples associatd with human activities formed a consistent series, beginning with the present and going back in time, a series that was correlated with the depth from which the samples came. The oldest and deepest sample was dated at 19,650 years before the present, plus or minus 2,400 years. Skeptics, viewing that date as too early and inconsistent with the accepted date of human migration into North America, suggested that the samples could have been contaminated by dissolved "old carbon" carried by percolating  from nearby coal deposits.

Which one of the following considerations, if true, argues most strongly against the suggestion of the skeptics?

A  No likely mechanism of contamination involving percolating groundwater would have affected the deeper samples from the site without affecting the uppermost sample.

B  Not every application of the carbon-dating procedure has led to results that hae been generally acceptable to scientists.

C  There is no evidence that people were using coal for fuel at any time when the deepest layer might have been laid down.

D  No sample in the series, when retested by the carbon-dating procedure, was assigned an earlier date than that assigned to a sample from a layer above it.

E  No North American site besides the one in Pennsylvania has ever yielded a sample to which the carbon-dating procedure assigned a date that was comparably ancient.

文章中就没有提到uppermost sample,A到底是怎么反驳文章论点啊?
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-18 07:47
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部