ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2098|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[求助]prep1 Essay10 Q34 求助

[复制链接]
#
匿名  发表于 1970-1-1 08:00:00
地板
发表于 2010-10-24 10:03:44 | 只看该作者
这题不是选E么?
板凳
发表于 2010-5-18 01:38:37 | 只看该作者
E说whenever,但是文中只是说没有充分的考虑是否有增长的空间,不相符。E错。。
沙发
发表于 2010-4-25 11:50:56 | 只看该作者
虽然我也错了,但是我觉得定位在这里:
The second argument supposes that the government will tend to finance its deficits by increasing the money supply with insufficient regard for whether there is enough room for economic growth to enable such an increase to occur without causing inflation.
with insufficient regard 就是careless。考虑不充分。
楼主
发表于 2009-10-17 21:25:00 | 只看该作者

[求助]prep1 Essay10 Q34 求助

Conventional wisdom has it that large deficits in the United States budget cause interest rates to rise.  Two main arguments are given for this claim.  According to the first, as the deficit increases, the government will borrow more to make up for the ensuing shortage of funds.  Consequently, it is argued, if both the total supply of credit (money available for borrowing) and the amount of credit sought by nongovernment borrowers remain relatively stable, as is often supposed, then the price of credit (the interest rate) will increase.  That this is so is suggested by the basic economic principle that if supplies of a commodity (here, credit) remain fixed and demand for that commodity increases, its price will also increase.  The second argument supposes that the government will tend to finance its deficits by increasing the money supply with insufficient regard for whether there is enough room for economic growth to enable such an increase to occur without causing inflation.  It is then argued that financiers will expect the deficit to cause inflation and will raise interest rates, anticipating that because of inflation the money they lend will be worth less when paid back.

 

 

Unfortunately for the first argument, it is unreasonable to assume that nongovernment borrowing and the supply of credit will remain relatively stable.  Nongovernment borrowing sometimes decreases.  When it does, increased government borrowing will not necessarily push up the total demand for credit.  Alternatively, when credit availability increases, for example through greater foreign lending to the United States, then interest rates need not rise, even if both private and government borrowing increase.

 

 

The second argument is also problematic.  Financing the deficit by increasing the money supply should cause inflation only when there is not enough room for economic growth.  Currently, there is no reason to expect deficits to cause inflation.  However, since many financiers believe that deficits ordinarily create inflation, then admittedly they will be inclined to raise interest rates to offset mistakenly anticipated inflation.  This effect, however, is due to ignorance, not to the deficit itself, and could be lessened by educating financiers on this issue.

Question #34.  154-03  (22834-!-item-!-188;#058&000154-03)

It can be inferred from the passage that proponents of the second argument would most likely agree with which of the following statements?

(A) The United States government does not usually care whether or not inflation increases.

(B) People in the United States government generally know very little about economics.

(C) The United States government is sometimes careless in formulating its economic policies.

(D) The United States government sometimes relies too much on the easy availability of foreign credit.

(E) The United States government increases the money supply whenever there is enough room for growth to support the increase.

我实在是想不明白为啥选C,E错哪了呢?

麻烦大家帮我提供下思路吧,非常感谢呀。。。。

我实在是想不明白为啥选C,E错哪了呢?

麻烦大家帮我提供下思路吧,非常感谢呀。。。。

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-6-23 15:04
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部