hypnotized

sima3110

今天刚做到这个题，看了OG的解释，也是一头雾水。

daodaodog

有人懂吗？

daodaodog

问道题目： when hypnotized subjects are told that they are deaf and are then asked whether they can hear the hypnotist,they reply,"no".some theorists try to explain this result by arguing that the selves of hypnotized subjects are dissociated into separate parts ,and that the part that is deaf is dissociated from the part that replies. which of following challenges indicates the most serious weakeness in the attempted explanation described above? (a)why does the part that replies not answer,"yes"? (b)why are the observes facts in need of any special explanation? (c)why do the subjects appear to accept the hypnotist'ssuggestion that they are deaf? (d)why do  hypnotized subjects all respond the same way in the situation described? (e)why are the  parts of the self the same for all subjects ?

开始的半句话已经是悖论：asked whether they can hear the hypnotist,they reply,"no"
如果被催眠者听到问题，那么应该回答Yes；否则应该不需要也不会回答。
所以选项A已经是一个challenge，可是这个时候还没有涉及到后面的explanation.
到底这个explanation本身合理在什么地方（theorist认为的）？