|
这样吧,我来复制粘贴 1． ISSUE The issue of whether… is a complex and controversial one. Different people hold different views due to their respective angles. On the one hand, as is well-known and has often been advocated,…; on the other hand, others probably insist that… To some extent, I agree with the speaker’s general assertion that … if … However, the speaker unnecessarily extends the assertion to an irreversible extreme while overlooks other compelling factors that may affect this issue. On balance, my points of agreement and contention with the speaker involve the fundamental and deep analysis as discussed below. On the one hand, I would like to admit that the statement, although suffers from some obvious drawbacks, has some merits primarily in some special cases in which the implicit rationale behind it accords with common sense and our experience of daily life. Hence, it is partially indisputable. After all, even if. In other words,. Furthermore, after these evidence demonstrates beyond any doubt that On the other hand, recognizing that a more applicabe choice must incorporate different aspects of the issue as sufficient as possible, I have to point that the speaker overstates comparative significance, and fail to take other essential factors into consideration. In short, the assertion is problematic in two aspects. The first argument----the one that I think the most compelling---is that the speaker overlooked…. That is to say,… The second argument----it might have been noticed by others---is that in some occasion, it is rather difficult to … To sum up, the issue of …is a complex one, requiring subjective judgement. Consequently, there’re no easy or certain answers. So different are the personal experiences and emmotional concerns among people with diverse culture that thousand individuals might have thousand opinions. As far as I am concerned, 2．ARGUMENT In this argument the speaker reaches the conclusion that. To justify it, the argument points out that. Also, the argument points out that. At first glance, the speaker’s argument seems to be somewhat convincing, but further reflection reveals that it omits some important concerns that should be addressed to substantiate the argument.
In the first place, . In the second place, . In the third place, . To sum up,since the argument leaves out several key issues, it is ill-founded. As it stands, the reasoning does not constitute a logical argument in favor of the recommendation. To strengthen the argument, the author would have to provide concrete evidence to demonstrate that. Only with more convincing evidence could the argument become more than just an emmotional appeal. To better assess the argument, we need additional detailed information that so that we can establish the conclusion.
攻击ARGUMENT的几点 A threshold problem with the argument involves the statistical reliability of the survey. The author provides no evidence that the respondents were representative of in general. In addition, we are not informed how many were surveyed but did not respond. The greater this number, the less reliable the survey. Lacking information about the randomness and reliability of the survey’s sample, the author cannot make a convincing argument based on the survey.
Secondly, even if the respondents were representative of the entire population of , the author relies on the assumption that the responds themselves were reliable. However, the author provides no evidence that this is the case. Lacking evidence that the respondents’ report were both truthful and meaningful, the author cannot confidently draw any conclusion about from them
Thirdly, since the study only involved sample, it is impossible to confidently draw any conclusion about general subject from the study.
Fourthly, . However, it is entirely possible that one or more other factors were instead responsible for . Perhaps ; or perhaps. Either scenario would provide an alternative explanation for . Without weighing the proposal against alternatives, the author’s claim that is the best means of achieving is wholly unconvincing.
Fifthly, profit is a function of not only revenue but also expenses. Without a complete cost-benefit analysis, it is unfair to conclude that.
It is assumed without justification that all conditions have remained unchanged during different periods. Neverthelss, the speaker obviously neglected that evidence of years ago has little worthiness for future construction. It is entirely possible that many factors such as economic conditions and desirability of have changed over this time span. Any of the scenarios, if true, would serve to undermine the claim that.
Moreover, the author fails to take into accout the inherent differences between and. Perhaps the same couse of action would be ineffective on due to a myriad of differences, such as environmental, dietary, genetic, geological differences and disparity of average age, attitudes of residents, wholly economic conditions and so on. As a result, and establish an oversimplified analogy. Without accounting for these or other possible dissimilarities, the author cannot assume that what resulted in in would bring about the same result in . 见笑了 | 
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
匿名
发表于 1970-1-1 08:00:00
楼主
