ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1563|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD6_35,36

[复制链接]
#
匿名  发表于 1970-1-1 08:00:00
沙发
发表于 2009-3-13 23:18:00 | 只看该作者

Q 35,我选D,我是这样人为的,不是NN,仅供参考!

A

C

E

B争论了农村发展项目的采用-这一点却是占了很大的篇幅-但是重点是为了说明泰国经济发展的评估错误.

D正确批评了泰国经济发展的一定假设

 

楼主
发表于 2006-9-12 16:23:00 | 只看该作者

GWD6_35,36

Q35 to Q37:

(The following is excerpted from material written

in 1992.)

 

      Many researchers regard Thailand’s

       recent economic growth, as reflected by its

       gross domestic product (GDP) growth rates,

Line       as an example of the success of a modern

  (5)      technological development strategy based

on the market economics of industrialized

countries.  Yet by focusing solely on aggre-

gate economic growth data as the measure

of Thailand’s development, these research-

 (10)      ers have overlooked the economic impact of

rural development projects that improve

people’s daily lives at the village level—

such as the cooperative raising of water

buffalo, improved sanitation, and the devel-

 (15)      opment of food crops both for consumption

and for sale at local markets; such projects

are not adequately reflected in the country’s

GDP.  These researchers, influenced by

Robert Heilbroner’s now outdated develop-

 (20)      ment theory, tend to view nontechnological

       development as an obstacle to progress.

       Heilbroner’s theory has become doctrine in

some economics textbooks:  for example,

Monte Palmer disparages nontechnological

 (25)      rural development projects as inhibiting

constructive change.  Yet as Ann Kelleher’s

two recent case studies of the Thai villages

Non Muang and Dong Keng illustrate, the

nontechnological-versus-technological

 (30)      dichotomy can lead researchers not only to

overlook real advances achieved by rural

development projects but also mistakenly to

       conclude that because such advances are

initiated by rural leaders and are based on

 (35)      traditional values and practices, they retard

“real” economic development.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Q35:

The primary purpose of the passage is to

             

  1. explain the true reasons for the increase in Thailand’s GDP
  2. argue for the adoption of certain rural development projects
  3. question the value of technological development in Thailand
  4. criticize certain assumptions about economic development in Thailand
  5. compare traditional and modern development strategies in Thailand

Answer:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Q36:

It can be inferred from the passage that the term “real” in line 36 most likely refers to economic development that is

             

  1. based on a technological development strategy
  2. not necessarily favored by most researchers
  3. initiated by rural leader
  4. a reflection of traditional values and practices
  5. difficult to measure statistically

Answer:

这两个我怎么都想不通答案.谢谢大家.

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-5-20 06:35
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部