ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 8458|回复: 55
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[阅读小分队] 【揽瓜阁5.0】Day9 2021.02.16【自然科学-化学、天文、生物】

  [复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2021-2-15 22:43:56 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |正序浏览 |阅读模式
  揽瓜阁俱乐部第五期
  Day9 2021.02.16



【自然科学-化学】
How to separate oxygen from air using magnets:If it works, this vital gas should become cheaper
( The Economist-706 字 长阅读)

Oxygen is vital. Literally so for breathing, and thus for many hospital patients. And metaphorically for industries ranging from steelmaking to pharmaceuticals, which use it in their processes. The world market for the gas is therefore large. Various estimates put it as having been between about $28bn and $49bn in 2019.

It could, though, be larger. In a set of reactions that also involve oxygen and steam, fossil fuels such as coal and natural gas can be turned into hydrogen, a source of energy, and carbon dioxide, which can be separated and sequestered underground. That might allow their continued employment in a world of restricted greenhouse-gas emissions. It would, however, require a cheap and abundant supply of oxygen. Which is why America’s Department of Energy is sponsoring a project intended to pull oxygen from the atmosphere with magnets.

Dry air is a mixture of 21% oxygen, 78% nitrogen and 1% argon, with a few other trace gases such as carbon dioxide. At the moment, most of the world’s pure oxygen is made by the liquefaction and subsequent distillation of air, to separate it into its components. This is done in large factories. The other source of oxygen, somewhat less pure, is small, mobile plants called oxygen concentrators. These either absorb the nitrogen into a porous substance called a zeolite, leaving behind a gas that is 90% oxygen, or force air through membranes more permeable to one gas than the other, yielding a somewhat less rich mixture. The alternative of magnetic separation is the brainchild of John Vetrovec, boss of Aqwest, a technology firm in Larkspur, Colorado.

Though oxygen cannot be magnetised permanently in the way that elements like iron can, it is attracted by magnetic fields. As a consequence, when air is pumped through such a field its oxygen gets concentrated in those places where the field is strongest. This concentration-enhancement is small. But if the oxygen-enriched part of the air stream could be separated from the oxygen-impoverished part, and then treated in the same way over and over again, it could be enriched to the point where it was pure enough to be useful. Dr Vetrovec thinks he knows how to do this.

A previous attempt by a different group of engineers used pulsed electromagnets. This, though, required both high pressure, which is expensive to create, and the electromagnets themselves, which are costly to buy and costly to run. Dr Vetrovec intends to perform his version of the trick at atmospheric pressure, and using permanent magnets. Both of these modifications greatly reduce power consumption. In fact, the device’s only moving part is the blower which pushes air through it.

It’s a gas
The magic extra ingredient Aqwest brings to the party is an array of structures called microchannels. These are tubes less than a millimetre in diameter that are intended to carry liquids or gases. Crucially, their narrow bores ensure the laminar flow of any fluid passing through them. Translated from physics-speak, this means they cause no turbulence, and therefore no mixing of their contents. That allows them to act as gas separators in the firm’s device.

On the face of things, the initial results do not look that impressive. Prototypes yield a concentration increase of around 0.1% per passage, though Dr Vetrovec thinks his team can raise this to 0.4%. The key, though, is the repetition. Like the tale about a vizier who asked his king, as a reward for some service, for a grain of rice on the first square of a chess board, two grains on the second, four on the third, and so on, the oxygen concentration rises rapidly with successive iterations. Thirty passages at the higher rate would yield a 90% concentration of oxygen—and that would be commercially useful.

Whether this approach actually will prove cheaper than the established alternatives, and whether, if it does, that will really save fossil fuels’ bacon, remain to be seen. But some versions of a green-energy future involve the use of a lot of hydrogen, so better ways of generating that gas are always welcome. In the meantime, oxygen’s many other users would surely welcome a cheaper source of supply. The idea of doing this with magnets is attractive.

Source: The Economist


【自然科学-天文】
Mercury has molten core,radar reveals
( WSY -446 字 短精读)


Source: WSY


【自然科学-生物】
Early Mammals Had Social Lives, Too
(Scientific American-2分26秒-328字-精听)

先做听力再核对原文哦~


Seventy-six million years ago, a group of small mammals huddled in a burrow in what’s now Montana. They were good diggers—most likely furry—and petite.

“They could sit comfortably in the palm of your hand. These things, if you saw them running around today, you’d think it’s a small rodent—a chipmunk or mouse.”

Lucas Weaver is a mammal paleobiologist at University of Washington.

These little creatures didn’t belong to any of the three main mammal groups on the planet today—which are the placental mammals (like us), monotremes (like the platypus) and marsupials (like koalas and kangaroos).

Instead they belonged to another, now extinct group called the “multituberculates.”

“They have these really bizarre molars with multiple bumps, which is where they get their name. Multituberculate. just means ‘many bumps.’”

Weaver and his colleagues have studied the fossilized skulls and skeletons of these animals, dug up in Montana, and they’ve given them a name: Filikomys primaevus (friendly or neighborly mouse).

The details are in the journal Nature Ecology & Evolution.

Weaver says drought or climate change may have killed the animals, though it’s hard to be sure. But the critters were fossilized together in ways that suggest they sought out each others’ company. That’s a big deal because it’s commonly thought that social behavior didn’t arise in mammals until after the death of the dinosaurs, 10 million years after these small critters hung out together.

“The narrative, for decades, has been that mammals living during the time of dinosaurs were mostly solitary ratlike creatures scuttling in the night under dinosaurs. And so the fact we’re finding these multituberculate mammals—a totally unrelated group of mammals—exhibiting social behavior means this was probably not uncommon among these early Mesozoic mammals. And it changes the narrative that sociality is somehow unique to placental mammals.”

Even today, social behavior is relatively rare among mammals. But these findings suggest the need for company in some mammalian species is an ancient evolutionary invention.

Source: Scientific American


【笔记格式要求】
同学们任选 2 篇文章精读/精听并进行笔记打卡

精读笔记格式要求:
1.总结文章中心大意
2.总结分论点或每段段落大意
3.摘抄印象深刻或者觉得优美的句子
4.总结文章中的生词
5.记录阅读时间、总结时间、总时间

精听笔记格式要求:
1.逐句听写整篇文章
2.对照原文修改听写稿,标记出错原因
3.总结文章中心大意
4.总结精听过程中的生词
5.记录听写时间、总结时间、总时间

这里也给大家三点学习小建议哦~
精读:如遇到读不懂的复杂句,建议找出句子主干,分析句子成分,也可以尝试翻译句子来帮助理解~
精听:建议每句不要反复纠结听,如果听 5 遍都没听出来,那就跳过,等完成后再回听总结原因,时间宝贵,不要过于执着哦~



本帖子中包含更多资源

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?立即注册

x
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
56#
发表于 2021-3-27 20:50:26 | 只看该作者
打卡day9

本帖子中包含更多资源

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?立即注册

x
55#
发表于 2021-2-20 20:33:49 | 只看该作者
补卡。辛苦大家了,谢谢!

本帖子中包含更多资源

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?立即注册

x
54#
发表于 2021-2-19 14:35:05 | 只看该作者
day9补卡

本帖子中包含更多资源

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?立即注册

x
53#
发表于 2021-2-18 12:22:59 | 只看该作者
Day 9 补卡 加油加油!
记录阅读时间、总结时间、总时间
20 min, 15 min

1. 主题
介绍新的方法提纯氧气。

2.分论点
Para 1(1-3):主题+背景:
Gas用途很广泛。每年消费额也很大。
气体行业包含很多气体分支,包括温室排放气体。
介绍主要气体:氧气的两种制作方法;1.空气提纯。2.晒除氮气,或者薄膜过滤。(低纯度)

Para 2(4-5):介绍新方法提纯氧气,更加便宜,操作更简单。
氧气不能像铁那样提纯,靠磁性(或其他)高纯度氧气从空气中吸收低纯度氧气。但是V找到了方法。
介绍成功地方法:Pulsed elec法。但是V把里面最昂贵的部分:高压,和xx磁换成了常压和永磁铁。大大降低了价格。

Para 3(6-8):讲方法原理以及评价:
新方法效果很显著,纯度高于90%。
不论现在是否更便宜或者节约化石能源减少温室气体排放,这个趋势总是好的



3.摘抄印象深刻或者觉得优美的句子
Crucially, their narrow bores ensure the laminar flow of any fluid passing through them. Translated from physics-speak, this means they cause no turbulence, and therefore no mixing of their contents. That allows them to act as gas separators in the firm’s device.

4.总结文章中的生词
Crucially 至关重要的

记录阅读时间、总结时间、总时间
3 min,  7 min


1. 主题


2.分论点
Para 1:老观点:水星表面很热。来自于最新发现。
Para 2:老观点认为:水星核心应该是固体
Para 3:新观点认为:核心可能是液体。
Para 4:补出证据支持新观点:自传很快,而液体核心会让自传更容易。
Para 5:继续论证核心是液体。至少核心外部夹层是。

3.摘抄印象深刻或者觉得优美的句子


4.总结文章中的生词

Na


52#
发表于 2021-2-17 23:02:36 | 只看该作者
day 9 打卡

本帖子中包含更多资源

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?立即注册

x
51#
发表于 2021-2-17 20:22:27 | 只看该作者
果然挂着梯子全局模式容易出问题。。。

本帖子中包含更多资源

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?立即注册

x
50#
发表于 2021-2-17 14:39:00 | 只看该作者
第1篇:
阅读 5'45"  总结  10'

中心大意
当前工业对氧气的需求量很大,文章重点介绍了通过磁场提取纯氧的方法,这一方法具有发展前景。

分论点
1~2 氧气不论对人体还是工业生产都很重要,当前氧气的需求量巨大。
3 介绍氧气的获取方式:空气中含有氧气,通过大工厂蒸馏分离成分;通过固氧植物获得纯度稍低的氧气;JV还提出了用磁铁分离出氧气
4.磁场提取纯氧的原理:空气通过磁场时,氧气能够集中在场强的位置,分离氧气集中和氧气低的部分并重复这一过程,可以获得足够纯的氧气
5.之前有工程师尝试了电磁方法,但存在一些缺陷。V改进这一方法,减少了能源消耗
6~7 磁场中 Aqwest进行气体分离的原理。通过不断重复分离的过程,氧气可以达到90%的纯度
8.这一方法的可行性仍待考察,但确实具有发展前景。

生词
Magnet n. 磁铁;[电磁] 磁体;磁石
Porous adj. 多孔渗水的;能渗透的;有气孔的

第2篇:
阅读 3'43"  总结 15'

中心大意
一项新的研究表明,水星内核中有液体

分论点
1.一项新的雷达研究表明,水星的内核中至少有一部分是液体
2.根据水星自身的位置和直径,天文学家计算出它应该很久以前就凝固了
3.1974年,M10飞船发现水星有磁场,反驳了前面的观点
4 P30年前提出,通过研究水星的旋转可以得出其内核是否有液体
5.经过6年的数据记录,M和P发现水星内核中有液体。科学家们指出水星和其他行星从其他地方获取硫,降低了熔点,使其内核中含有液体

生词
Mercury 水星,水银
Infiltrate vt. 使潜入;使渗入,使浸润
Remnant n. 剩余 adj. 剩余的
Configuration n. 配置;结构;外形
49#
发表于 2021-2-17 11:01:07 | 只看该作者
Day 9

本帖子中包含更多资源

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?立即注册

x
48#
发表于 2021-2-17 01:15:01 | 只看该作者
Day 9 打卡~今天迟了~害~



本帖子中包含更多资源

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?立即注册

x
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-2-7 19:11
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部