ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 12461|回复: 13
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[Helr题库] 求问一道新题【OG20-696题】

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2019-6-30 19:38:01 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |正序浏览 |阅读模式
【OG20-696题】A moderately large city is redesigning its central downtown area and is considering a plan that would reduce the number of lanes for automobiles and trucks and increase those for bicycles and pedestrians. The intent is to attract more workers and shoppers to downtown businesses by making downtown easier to reach and more pleasant to move around in.
Which of the following would, if true, most strongly support the prediction that the plan would achieve its goal?
A  People who make a habit of walking or bicycling whenever feasible derive significant health benefits from doing so.
B  Most people who prefer to shop at suburban malls instead of downtown urban areas do so because parking is easier and cheaper at the former.
C  Most people who own and frequently ride bicycles for recreational purposes live at a significant distance from downtown urban areas.
D  If the proposed lane restrictions on drivers are rigorously enforced, more people will likely be attracted to downtown businesses than would otherwise be.
E  In other moderately sized cities where measures were taken to make downtowns more accessible for walkers and cyclists, downtown businesses began to thrive.
正确答案:E
我最后DE二选一选了D,请问D为什么不可以?
收藏收藏1 收藏收藏1
14#
发表于 2023-7-29 22:08:57 | 只看该作者
行素 发表于 2019-7-4 21:03
D算是重复前提,最主要的是不能加强。比如,我听了ron的课,sc就能被解决。一个人说:CD上的大神都这么干并 ...

同意!               
13#
发表于 2021-8-30 16:06:12 | 只看该作者
D选项解析:IF自己增添了条件!是重大的回答逻辑错误!
就像我问“谁能举个例子,说明我们的政策will succeed”,某选项说“如果我们能够额外再做到XXX,那么我们的政策会更可能succeed啦”。明显大错误!!!
12#
发表于 2020-7-2 12:46:15 | 只看该作者
D选项比较了这个plan和其他plan,说这个plan比其他plan效果好,但是并不能说明这个plan就一定能达成目标。有可能所有的plan都不能达成这个目标,而只有题目中提到的plan相对而言效果好一点
11#
发表于 2020-7-2 04:17:15 | 只看该作者
感觉其他城市的成功案例在方案strengthen题中是一个常见的答案

还有一个类似的例子是og上的另一题
"The heavy traffic in Masana is a growing drain on the city's economy—the clogging of the streets of the central business district alone cost the economy more than $1.2 billion over the past year. In order to address this problem, officials plan to introduce congestion pricing, by which drivers would pay to enter the city's most heavily trafficked areas during the busiest times of the day.

Which of the following, if true, would most strongly indicate that the plan will be a success?

(A) Approximately one-fifth of the vehicles in the central business district are in transit from one side of the city to the other .
(B) Planners expect that, without congestion pricing, traffic in Masana is likely to grow by 6 percent in the next five years .
(C) In other urban areas, congestion pricing has strongly encouraged carpooling (sharing of rides by private commuters).
(D) Several studies have shown that a reduction in traffic of 15 percent in Masana could result in 5,500 or more new jobs.
(E) Over 30 percent of the vehicles in the city's center are occupied by more than one person"

这里就是选C 其他Urban areas的成功案例
10#
发表于 2020-6-1 20:24:47 | 只看该作者
重复前提确实是加强选项, 但D选项不是重复前提. 原文的前提是减少车道, 增加步道, 没说rigorously enforced; 认真听Ron的课≠听Ron的课, 不是重复.
CR里有很多题其实考查的就是提取中心, 准确理解原文和选项表达的意思.
9#
发表于 2019-9-12 21:56:54 | 只看该作者
行素 发表于 2019-7-4 21:03
D算是重复前提,最主要的是不能加强。比如,我听了ron的课,sc就能被解决。一个人说:CD上的大神都这么干并 ...

同意!               
8#
发表于 2019-8-4 18:13:45 | 只看该作者
簡單的接線而已。

如果原文邏輯要對, 那必要假設就是- " 這些多的工作者以及消費者必然走路且騎腳踏車 ”, 同時之間, 這裡有個因果邏輯。

因為實施計畫, 所以目標成功。

所以在要加強邏輯的時候馬上尋找三個點

1. 馬上刪掉所有必要假設取非的選項

2. 從剩下的選項裡面找尋有無其他的例子有如此的因果關係

3. 如果都找不到, 用反證法:  沒因, 所以沒果


如果你認為D為答案, 那你就是自行假設了 ” more people be attracted must be either workers or shoppers, or both, and they must be either pedestrians or bicyclist, or both "
7#
发表于 2019-8-3 17:17:59 | 只看该作者
不是咸yu 发表于 2019-7-30 21:43
请问各位大神,E选项的话不会存在一个类比不成立的问题吗?在别的地方成功在这里不一定成功呀
...

充分必要性的区别

只要必要性,不是必须支持/解释/削弱entirely,只要能支持/解释/削弱就行。
6#
发表于 2019-7-30 21:43:22 | 只看该作者
请问各位大神,E选项的话不会存在一个类比不成立的问题吗?在别的地方成功在这里不一定成功呀
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-16 02:54
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部