先贴全文：
During the nineteenth century, occupational information about women that was provided by the United States census--a population count conducted each decade--became more detailed and precise in response to social changes. Through 1840, simple enumeration by household mirrored a home-based agricultural economy and hierarchical social order: the head of the household (presumed male or absent) was specified by name, whereas other household members were only indicated by the total number of persons counted in various categories, including occupational categories. Like farms, most enterprises were family-run, so that the census measured economic activity as an attribute of the entire household, rather than of individuals. The 1850 census, partly responding to antislavery and women's rights movements, initiated the collection of specific information about each individual in a household. Not until 1870 was occupational information analyzed by gender: the census superintendent reported 1.8 million women employed outside the home in "gainful and reputable occupations." In addition, he arbitrarily attributed to each family one woman "keeping house." Overlap between the two groups was not calculated until 1890, when the rapid entry of women into the paid labor force and social issues arising from industrialization were causing women's advocates and women statisticians to press for more thorough and accurate accounting of women's occupations and wages.
读不懂的句子： Not until 1870 was occupational information analyzed by gender: the census superintendent reported 1.8 million women employed outside the home in "gainful and reputable occupations." In addition, he arbitrarily attributed to each family one woman "keeping house."
请问，这两句话怎么理解？它报道1.8m的女人在外工作。同时他随意的认为每个家庭有一个女人持家。？ 那这会有overlap的部分吗？而且我读这个文章的时候，overlap between two groups的two groups,我还以为是male and female,因为它前面说anlyzed by gender. 这个文章也太容易误导人了吧？？？
请大牛赐教！！
| 
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2017-3-15 16:33:03
收藏
收藏
楼主