问题解答

小霸王

感觉楼上的都没有讲到点子上，这种题目切记翻译成中文去理解，一定要去理解英文的意思这个道题有一个因果关系在
support1
cause: technological improvements------->effect:higher labor productivity
support2
Parland's labor productivity is higher than that of Vergia
conclusion: higher labor productivity------->higher technological improvement

A、it offers a conclusion that is no more than a paraphrase of one of the pieces of information in its support
paraphrase 的意思是阐释，示意。no more than太绝对了，说的是support和conclusion完全不想管，错误
B、support1 is inconsistent with support 2，明显错误，两个support没有矛盾
D、这个选项迷惑性比较大，it takes a condition to be the effect of something that happened only after the condition already existed，意思是把条件当做结果，这个结果只在该条件成立的情况下成立
表达了两个意思
1、something, which is the "effect" happens only after the condition already existed
2、it takes a condition to be the effect of something ("true effect")
cause: technological improvements------->effect:higher labor productivity
逐条验证: something( effect:higher labor productivity) happens only after the condition (technological improvement) already existed, wrong

it takes a condition to be the effect of "true effect"把条件当做结果，这个意思我觉得没问题
E、presuppose the truth of the conclusion that is to be established,wrong。presuppose意思是假定，以....为先决条件。两个support并没有以结论为先决条件

小霸王

lisiberry 发表于 2017-3-12 17:58
Hi，小霸王同学，不知道你回复的是哪道题。

不好意思，写成帖子了。我后来又粘了一下回复到那个题目下面了。对，就是你粘的这个题哈

lisiberry

好像是这道题
OG13 CR08

In virtually any industry, technological improvements increase labor productivity, which is the output of goods and services per person-hour worked. In Parland’s industries, labor productivity is significantly higher than it is in Vergia’s industries. Clearly, therefore, Parland’s industries must, on the whole, be further advanced technologically than Vergia’s are.
The argument is most vulnerable to which of the following criticisms?
(A) It offers a conclusion that is no more than a paraphrase of one of the pieces of information provided in its support.
(B) It presents as evidence in support of a claim information that is inconsistent with other evidence presented in support of the same claim.
(C) It takes one possible cause of a condition to be the actual cause of that condition without considering any other possible causes.
(D) It takes a condition to be the effect of something that happened only after the condition already existed.
(E) It makes a distinction that presupposes the truth of the conclusion that is to be established.


OA：C

lisiberry

Hi，小霸王同学，不知道你回复的是哪道题。