OG最新一版 第52题有点想不通，在线等，谢谢

danlovely28

                                                                                                                                                [size=15.000000pt]52. Although computers can enhance people’s ability to communicate, computergames are a cause of underdeveloped communication skills in children. After-school hours spent playing computer games are hours not spent talking withpeople. Therefore, children who spend all their spare time playing these gameshave less experience in interpersonal communication than other children have.
                               
                       
               
                                                                                                                [size=15.000000pt]The argument depends on which of the following assumptions?
                                        [size=15.000000pt](A) Passive activities such as watching television and listening to music donot hinder the development of communication skills in children.
                                        [size=15.000000pt](B) Most children have other opportunities, in addition to after-schoolhours, in which they can choose whether to play computer games or tointeract with other people.
                                        [size=15.000000pt](C) Children who do not spend all of their after-school hours playingcomputer games spend at least some of that time talking with other people.
                                        [size=15.000000pt](D) Formal instruction contributes little or nothing to children’s acquisitionof communication skills.
                                        [size=15.000000pt](E) The mental skills developed through playing computer games do notcontribute significantly to children’s intellectual development.
[size=15.000000pt]

[size=15.000000pt]结论是小孩子花所有课余时间玩游戏的比其他小孩子缺乏个人交流能力，在下面选项中找出一个支持结论成立的假设，可是为什么选C，我有点不太明白，求各位大神帮帮我。
                               
                       
               

Jagabee

assumption question解题的点就在于找到隐含的要素, 这个要素如果被推翻, 结论就不成立 （Manhattan: negation rule for assumption question)

P: 因为放学把时间花在玩电脑游戏就无法与人交流
C：所以这样做的小孩比其他小孩子缺乏个人交流能力

决定性因素：花在玩电脑游戏上的时间，因为这个时间本可以Spent on talking with other people
问题来了: 那些不玩游戏的就一定会把一部分时间花在和人talking上吗

如果不， 结论不成立, 玩不玩游戏都不会交流, 为嘛专门针对玩游戏的孩子说他们能力低？
如果是, 结论成立

所以 c点出了argument的key factor也是assumption

ArielFeb

C：原文说以为玩电脑，不和别人说话，所以交流技巧比其他孩子低。它的假设是不玩电脑的孩子确实会和其他人交流，进而交流技巧确实会高。要是不玩电脑的孩子在下课时间都是睡觉的，不和比人交流的话，那么交流技巧也很低。