ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 16775|回复: 72
打印 上一主题 下一主题

逻辑啊逻辑~欢迎大家讨论!

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2015-8-2 13:38:06 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |正序浏览 |阅读模式
逻辑有几个不明白的,都列在这,希望大家踊跃回答解答难题~~会啥就回复啥,前面写好题号就好喽~多谢大家!

1.Five years ago, as part of a plan toencourage citizens of Levaska to increase the amount of money they put intosavings, Levaska’s government introduced special savings accounts in which upto $3,000 a yearcan be saved with no tax due on the interest unless money is withdrawn beforethe account holder reaches the age of sixty-five.  Millions of dollars have accumulated in thespecial accounts, so the government’s plan is obviously working.
Which of the following, if true, mostseriously weakens the argument?
A.   A substantial number of Levaskans havewithdrawn at least some of the money they had invested in the special accounts.
B.   Workers in Levaska who already save money inlong-term tax-free accounts that are offered through their workplace cannottake advantage of the special savings accounts introduced by the government.
C.   The rate at which interest earned on moneydeposited in regular savings accounts is taxed depends on the income bracket ofthe account holder.
D.   Many Levaskans who already had long-termsavings have steadily been transferring those savings into the specialaccounts.
E.    Many of the economists who now claim thatthe government’s plan has been successful criticized it when it was introduced.
答案是D
我选的是A:理由是,鼓励把钱存入SPECIAL ACCOUNT 就能实现PLAN,但是很多人们现在都存了进去了,可是还是要取这不就没有达到存钱的效果了么。。。不是削弱么
后来我又觉得B 对,因为大家都把钱存到WORKPLACE OFFER的FREE ACCOUNT里了,那这个SPECIAL ACCOUNT肯定就放不了了啊。。
D 怎么能是削弱啊,完全是顺着题目说的啊,把钱一点点存到SPECIAL ACCOUNT里。。

2. A study of marital relationships in which one partner's sleeping and waking cycles differ from those of the other partner reveals that such couples share fewer activities with each other and have more violent arguments than do couples in a relationship in which bother partners follow the same sleeping and waking patterns. Thus, mismatched sleeping and waking cycles can seriously jeopadize a marriage.
which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument above?
A. married couples in which both spouses follow the same sleeping and waking patterns also occasionally have argumetns that can jeopardize the couple's marriage/
D. people in unhappy marriages have been found to express hostility by adopting a different sleeping and waking cycle from that of their spouses.
答案是D
我选的是A, 理由是原文说MISMATCHED的SLEEPING/WAKING CYCLE破坏婚姻,那只要找出别的理由也能破坏婚姻,或是MISMATCH不会破坏婚姻不就削弱了么。。所以A不正好说的是MATCH CYCLE的一对也是会破坏婚姻的,也就是说别的理由也能破坏婚姻,不就是削弱了么。。不明白为什么错。


3. A researcher discovered that people who have low levels of immune system activity tend to score much lower on tests of mental health than do people with normal or high immune system activity. The research concluded from this experiment that the immune system protects against mental illness as well as against phsical disease.
The researcher's conclusion depends on whcih of the following assumptions?
B. Mental illness is similar to physical disease in its effects on body systems
D. mental illness does not cause people's immune system activity to decrease.
答案是D。我选的B。。。。

就这三道题。多谢大家帮助!!!

收藏收藏 收藏收藏
推荐
发表于 2015-8-13 16:00:41 | 只看该作者
qsgmat 发表于 2015-8-13 12:51
Which of the following most logically completes the argument?

The growing popularity of computer ...

对于Complete Argument的题,若结论突然与前面说的来一个大转弯,我会将它当做weaken处理。
所以这题的逻辑链是:
∵ studies found that people who own  computer watch less tv than whose do not own computer
∴ computer use reduce television viewing time.
求weaken

你应该有做过类似的题目吧,比如说有一题“(前提)说一项调查发现,在一年内开始吸烟的人会比一年内没有吸烟的人容易得抑郁症,(结论)说明吸烟导致抑郁症。”这种题目往往是有一个research/study/survey引出的,那么对于这种调查类型的题目,也可以说是样本型的题目,往往要留意 样本是否充足,样本是否有代表性的问题。
本题C答案攻击的就是:样本是否有样本性。
假如本来有电脑的人在没电脑之前就已经很少看电视的话,那么就能够说明有电脑没有导致少看电视。

C翻译下来: 有电脑的用户本来就比其它用户少看电视。

假如没有C,E也勉强可以,可是你注意一下E选项其实是有误导性的,它说 leaves more  leisure time for watching television,它说会留下更多时间可以用于看电视,并没有说人们省下来这些时间就是用来看电视。
73#
发表于 2018-12-15 10:13:52 | 只看该作者
leoona_lee 发表于 2015-8-28 08:22
前提:只有充分欣赏当代乡村音乐才能更好地了解美国的乡村音乐史。
结论:因此,喜欢当代乡村音乐的人会更 ...

虽然已经好几年过去了,但是看到大神解答还是醍醐灌顶,感谢!!!
72#
发表于 2018-12-15 09:03:27 | 只看该作者
alzn2765 发表于 2015-8-6 10:30
就是

给钱不等于一定变“好”

膜拜大佬!
71#
发表于 2018-1-20 16:27:23 | 只看该作者
我感觉BDE都有反对前提的嫌疑
题干已经说了Recent studies have found…… 所以不能用“调查人群”作为理由来削弱。
要找一个另外的原因来削弱,所以只能是C

逻辑题千万不能去质疑前提啊!!
70#
发表于 2017-12-4 17:24:52 | 只看该作者
leoona_lee 发表于 2015-8-13 16:00
对于Complete Argument的题,若结论突然与前面说的来一个大转弯,我会将它当做weaken处理。
所以这题的逻 ...

个人感觉DE错的原因是:这些有电脑的人他们有更多的时间看电视,但是他们并没有看(题目条件),说明的确电脑的使用可以影响看电视的时间。而题目问的是这个发现不能解释电脑的使用会影响看电视,是因为什么
DE变成可以解释了
69#
发表于 2016-7-9 23:53:40 | 只看该作者
alzn2765 发表于 2015-8-6 10:30
就是

给钱不等于一定变“好”

此贴已收录至《Alzn大神CD答疑集合》。
68#
发表于 2016-7-9 23:50:03 | 只看该作者
alzn2765 发表于 2015-8-6 09:32
“绝对”与“相对”:这是GMAT数学相关类逻辑题要考察的永恒知识点。

比如:百分比 vs 绝对值

此贴已收录至《Alzn大神CD答疑集合》。
67#
发表于 2016-7-9 23:48:15 | 只看该作者
alzn2765 发表于 2015-8-6 00:05
反了,孩子给老人钱花。

逻辑:以前没养老金,我给我爹100元,我爹正好够花。现在政府给我爹50养老金, ...

此贴已收录至《Alzn大神CD答疑集合》。
66#
 楼主| 发表于 2015-9-6 16:57:10 | 只看该作者
leoona_lee 发表于 2015-8-28 11:10
1、
关于这个to...to,其实我一开始的理解也和你一样。
可是根据to see is to believe, 眼见了才为实又觉 ...

亲~~~我这周五就考啦!!!还有两个逻辑题 OG上的
你帮我看一下!!!多谢多谢1!!

1. For a trade embargo against a particular country to succeed. a hight degree of both international accord and ability to prevent goods from entering or leaving that country must be sustained. A total blackade of P's port is necessary to an embargo, but such anaction would be likely to cause international discord over the embargo? (P是一个地名哈~)

The claims above, if true, most strongly supposrt which of the following conclusion ?
A. As long as international opinion is unanimously against P, a trade embargo is likely to succeed.
B. Any trade embargo against P would be likely to fail at some time
C. For a blockade of P port to be successful, international opinion must be unanimous.
第一个选B

2.Commentator: the theory of trade retaliation states that countries closed out of any of another country's markets should close some of their own market to the other country in order to pressure the other country to reopen its markets. If every country acted according to this theory, no country would trade with any other.

第二个选B

The commentator's argument relies on which of the following assumptions?
A. No country should block any of its markets to foreign trade.
B. For any two countries, at least one has some market closed to the other.
65#
发表于 2015-8-28 11:10:57 | 只看该作者
qsgmat 发表于 2015-8-28 09:12
还有啊,我觉得这里To fully appreciate contemporary folk songs is to understand the history of Amer ...

1、
关于这个to...to,其实我一开始的理解也和你一样。
可是根据to see is to believe, 眼见了才为实又觉得是先apperciate 才能 去 understand。
这个句型我也不大懂哈。

2、
其实therefore 前面的句子也不一定就是premise,哪个是premise哪个background我觉得有时还挺不容易看见的。
不过 many people don't 应该不能算是premise吧...
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-1 19:54
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部