- UID
- 496873
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2009-12-18
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
练了一篇OG Practice Test 2上的综合作文,259字。不知超过225字会不会被扣分。同时,请同鞋指教,先谢了!
The lecture apparently refutes the passage. It is said in the lecture that professor on TV program are not good for professors, not good for university, and not good for the public. Contrary to passage that professor can benefit from their presence on TV because of broader audiences, the professor says that professor's presence on TV is a major disadvantage for professor. The professor claims that presence on TV is not good for professor from the academic point of view because TV audience is usually watching TV for entertainment rather than education. A professor on TV may not be invited to a important academic conference or not get enough funding for their research. In addition, the lecture refutes the point that presence on TV will bring reputation for the university the professor working for. The professor point out that the increasing time on TV and relevant issues will reduce time for professor to do research, meeting students, or attending university business meetings. Thus, presence on TV is not good for the university. Finally, the lecture states that presence on TV is not good for the public as well, which is contradict to the view in the passage. The lecture argues that the program for TV are not seriously produced for the intention to reflect the professor's insight on some issue, rather, the public is more interested in the title rather than the content that professor presents on TV. In sum, the lecture doubts that professor's presence on TV will not be likely good for university, public and professors themselves. |
|