还有一周就考了 球拍谢谢issue59科学家的使命

mikezidane

59) Scientists and other researchers shouldfocus their research on areas that are likely to benefit the greatest number ofpeople.

提纲
TS同意科学家研究目的是为了人类服务但并不一定是为了眼前利益

1科学家的确解决人们生活中的问题
2科学家也能研究一些日常生活不相关的事
3科学家其实分工不同有的 有的

The arguer claims that the researchesshould take heed on areas that can benefit as many people as possible. I agreeinsofar that the scientists are supposed to discover mysteries that canpositively influence human society, while, all of these activities should not besimply  motivated by the human's mosturgent need. For the development of human society will not be effectively madeby people's need at present.

Admittedly, scientists are regarded as theproblem solvers who can facilitate the human’s life during the social advancement.Researchers, who are supported by the nation taxation, overcome obstacles toreach new achievements and then repay the fruit of hardworking to people. ThomasEdison who is called as "the king of invention", owned thousands ofpatents in his age. The most impressive moment in his career is that of bringingthe light to human's life. By inventing lamps, Edisonmade it possible for individuals to work in the night and enhance the productivityof human society greatly. While most of the people in the world benefit from hisin this way, Edison
is praised as the “Wizardof Menlo Park”.    
In spite of the contributions of researcherstalked above, the scientists in the scientific activities can never be confinedrigidly in meeting people's increasing secular needs. Different from doctors,whose innate duty is one hundred percent diagnosing and solving patients'problems physically or mentally, the scientists, in a higher level, shoulder anindispensable responsible to foresee human's future and build a bridge to abetter world in front of us by means of their sophisticated technology. AlbeitEinstein, for example, spent all his life in researching Relativity which has almostnothing to do with most of the people in 1920s. But no one can deny the fact thatthis Jewish scientist pushed the human science and technology into the 21centryand physics text books in every country regard him as the greatest scientistsince Isaac Newton.

Actually, scientists in the world can bedivided into several categories such as those who devoted in applied scienceand those who are in the area of theoretical science. For the former kind ofresearchers whose domains can be automobile, energy, architecture, etc. Theirresearching products related with people's daily life firmly through the accomplishmentof modernization. Consequently these researchers are focus on the most hotlydebated issues such as saving gasoline during driving can benefit more thanmillions of ordinary people directly . While the latter kind of researchers canbe founding in the disciplines as mathematics, astronomy, and other seems"unworldly" areas. For them, people can not obviously obtain much ofthe immediate interests, However, people should not blame they for doing painstakingworks can spend taxation money while contribute few for common life. De facto, these"Hawking" style scientists are also thirsty for budgets with researchesbecause they contribute to the development of the overall human history in alone-term, they helped Armstrong to land on the moon, they explored the Mars incase that if one day earth is too crowded people can migrant to Martine forlife.  

In retrospect, it seems precipitous forsome one to regard scientists' duty in satisfying the big number of people. Inthis way, his/her perspective of science is relatively narrowed and limited. Frommy point of view, the most rational way of a well-informed observer is encouragingscientists to stick to their principles of make full use of their knowledge nomatter it is exploring the unknown in the universe or inventing new laptops forcustomers.
谢谢指导！

普渡哥

我觉得有点偏：

benefit the greatest number不一定是指解决日常问题，现代科学家的成果都需要公司转化到日常应用；

题目说科学家应该should 去做能对大多数人有用的东西，反面应该是，不一定要做对大多数人有用的东西，而不是跟日常生活有关或者无关。

作者说，科学家可以对日常有贡献，但题目是说应该。可以和应该之间的逻辑，我想不明白。

mikezidane

谢谢指导！！！ 看来我这个issue和argument题目一样 犯了很多逻辑错误
我改了一下 普渡哥你看看我如果这样阐述是否恰当  
TS同意科学家应该满足许多人的需求  但科学家的最终目的应该是造福全人类，而不是certain group of people

1科学家确实已经用自己的发明创造满足很多人的需求  爱迪生发明的电灯能让世界上大多数人们在晚上活动 而不是过着原始人日出而作 日落而息的生活

2然而也有一些时候科学家需要探索一些非常生僻的领域 不能马上产生造福大众的效果   比如理论物理 爱因斯坦 霍金  再比如科学家研究战胜艾滋病的方法 受众可能只占人类总数比例的一小部分  但还是有必要的 因为他们对于整个人类认知领域有推动作用

3事实上 科学家分工各用不同 有的在一些比较热门的领域 直接受益的人很多 比如研究能源 交通工具  而有的则是在小众领域辛苦耕耘 比如数学。不管他们的分工如何 只要他们能够在自己的领域做出杰出贡献 就称得上伟大
cs所以科学家应该坚持自己的科研道路 最总目标是造福全人类 不应该被以其领域是否容易造福大众而评价与衡量。  
期待考试的时候不要跑题

竹林中人

你上面的提纲很好，考试的时候能即时想出并写下来就很好了