ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1584|回复: 0
打印 上一主题 下一主题

TPO13 综合写作 求很拍~~

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2012-4-11 11:51:15 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
 The lecturer rejects the ideas made in thereading passage involved in the selling fossils in commercial markets. In heropinion, the benefits bring out by the selling fossils overweighs the negativeeffects with the following reasons.
 Tostart with, rather than preventing the public from seeing theses fossils as thereading states, the professor holds the view that the selling of fossilsincrease the exposure to the public, cause any institution who is capable ofbuying it like the library and private schools can purchase them and show it tothe public.
secondly, the professor challenges the idea that scientists are likelyto have free access to some of the most important fossil. Actually, as theprofessor claims, we have no idea whether a fossil is important or not beforeidentified by the scientists, so even a fossil is doomed to be owned by aprivate collector, it is passed through to the scientists at first. In thatcase, it is unfair for for the reading passage to judge that the selling offossils would hammer the scientific research.
 Atlast, the lecture rejects the idea that commercial fossil collectors destroyvaluable scientific evidence in the fossils. The professor reminds us that eventhere are damages caused by the private collectors, most of it can becountervailed by the efforts make by them in excavating fossils, the professoremphasize that it is better to have incomplete but large quantity of fossilthan have limited ones.
 Inconclusion, the lecturer raises some point that cast doubt on the accuracy ofthe reading, demonstrating that the commercial fossil activities are morebenefical than harmful.
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

所属分类: TOEFL / IELTS

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-8-20 22:23
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部