ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 3867|回复: 6
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD-8-Q9 求解求解!逻辑推理还是遵循原文??

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-5-11 20:24:42 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
GWD-8-Q9
The system of patent-granting, which confers temporary monopolies for the exploitation of new technologies, was originally established as an incentive to the pursuit of risky new ideas. Yet studies of the most patent-conscious business of all—the semiconductor industry—suggest that firms do not necessarily become more innovative as they increase their patenting activity. Ziedonis and Hall, for example, found that investment in research and development (a reasonable proxy for innovation) did not substantially increase between 1982 and 1992, the industry’s most feverish period of patenting. Instead, semiconductor firms simply squeezed more patents out of existing research and development expenditures. Moreover, Ziedonis and Hall found that as patenting activity at semiconductor firms increased in the 1980’s, the consensus among industry employees was that the average quality of their firms’ patents declined. Though patent quality is a difficult notion to measure, the number of times a patent is cited in the technical literature is a reasonable yardstick, and citations per semiconductor patent did decline during the 1980’s. This decline in quality may be related to changes in the way semiconductor firms managed their patenting process: rather than patenting to win exclusive rights to a valuable new technology, patents were filed more for strategic purposes, to be used as bargaining chips to ward off infringement suites or as a means to block competitors’ products.

GWD-8-Q9 :
The passage makes which of the following claims about patent quality in the semiconductor industry?

A.It was higher in the early 1980’s than it was a decade later.

B.it is largely independent of the number of patents granted.

C.It changed between 1982 and 1992 in ways that were linked to changes in research and development expenditures.

D.It is not adequately discussed in the industry’s technical literature.

E.It was measured by inappropriate means during the period from 1982 to 1992.
A我认为文中对应的是citations per semiconductor patent did decline during the 1980’s
B文中提到的衡量标准是the number of times a patent is cited in the technical literature is a reasonable yardstick,并没有提到number of patent;那么是否可是推理说independent呢?还是应该判断文中没有提到,直接排除选项!
.
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2011-5-14 16:40:32 | 只看该作者
今天过第二遍又看到了,请大家帮忙回答一下啦
板凳
发表于 2011-7-22 21:07:47 | 只看该作者
up   我也选的B,A哪里说了啊?
地板
发表于 2011-8-28 10:31:00 | 只看该作者
我也选B
5#
发表于 2011-9-12 20:51:28 | 只看该作者
as patenting activity at semiconductor firms increased in the 1980’s, the consensus among industry employees was that the average quality of their firms’ patents declined.
6#
发表于 2013-4-17 15:15:19 | 只看该作者
80年代开始下降也就是说80年代达到了顶峰自然是比之前高
7#
发表于 2013-6-14 09:22:54 | 只看该作者
读题,没问Infer问的是文章提出哪点了,AB都对但是B跑题了,而且推断总是有风险
A是明确说了的
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-9-1 01:32
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部