ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1481|回复: 5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

请教大全11,能帮忙?提点一下呢

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-8-16 20:16:00 | 只看该作者

请教大全11,能帮忙?提点一下呢

Archaeology as a profession faces two major problems. First, it is the poorest of the poor. Only paltry sums are available for excavating and even less is available for publishing the results and preserving the sites once excavated. Yet archaeologists deal with priceless objects every day. Second, there is the problem of illegal excavation, resulting in museum-quality pieces being sold to the highest bidder.提出问题



I would like to make an outrageous (exceeding the limits of what is usual) suggestion that would at one stroke (at one stroke: adv.一笔, 一举) provide funds for archaeology and reduce the amount of illegal digging. I would propose that scientific archeological expeditions and governmental authorities sell excavated artifacts on the open market. Such sales would provide substantial funds for the excavation and preservation of archaeological sites and the publication of results. At the same time, they would break the illegal excavator’s grip on the market, thereby decreasing the inducement to engage in illegal activities.解决问题



You might object that professionals excavate to acquire knowledge, not money. Moreover, ancient artifacts are part of our global cultural heritage, which should be available for all to appreciate, not sold to the highest bidder. I agree. Sell nothing that has unique artistic merit or scientific value. But, you might reply everything that comes out of the ground has scientific value. Here we part company. Theoretically, you may be correct in claiming that every artifact has potential scientific value. Practically, you are wrong.


I refer to the thousands of pottery vessels and ancient lamps that are essentially duplicates of one another. In one small excavation in Cyprus, archaeologists recently uncovered 2,000 virtually indistinguishable small jugs in a single courtyard, Even precious royal seal impressions known as l’melekh handles have been found in abundance—more than 4,000 examples so far.预期反对



The basements of museums are simply not large enough to store the artifacts that are likely to be discovered in the future. There is not enough money even to catalogue the finds; as a result, they cannot be found again and become as inaccessible as if they had never been discovered. Indeed, with the help of a computer, sold artifacts could be more accessible than are the pieces stored in bulging museum basements. Prior to sale, each could be photographed and the list of the purchasers could be maintained on the computer. A purchaser could even be required to agree to return the piece if it should become needed for scientific purposes.继续说明办法的好处



It would be unrealistic to suggest that illegal digging would stop if artifacts were sold on the open market. But the demand for the clandestine product would be substantially reduced. Who would want an unmarked pot when another was available whose provenance was known, and that was dated stratigraphically (stratigraphy: n.地层学, 地层中的岩石组成) by the professional archaeologist who excavated it?办法好处的原因


3.    Which of the following is mentioned in the passage as a disadvantage of storing artifacts in museum basements?


(A) Museum officials rarely allow scholars access to such artifacts.


(B) Space that could be better used for display is taken up for storage.  B===E


(C) Artifacts discovered in one excavation often become separated from each other.


(D) Such artifacts are often damaged by variations in temperature and humidity.(E)


(E) Such artifacts’ often remain uncatalogued and thus cannot be located once they are put in storage.


这里也是,B和E有什么不同,除了E比B详细外,大家都说artifacts的storage不够。


5.    The author’s argument concerning the effect of the official sale of duplicate artifacts on illegal excavation is based on which of the following assumptions?


(A) Prospective purchasers would prefer to buy authenticated artifacts.


(B) The price of illegally excavated artifacts would rise.


(C) Computers could be used to trace sold artifacts. C===A


(D) Illegal excavators would be forced to sell only duplicate artifacts.(A)


(E) Money gained from selling authenticated artifacts could be used to investigate and prosecute illegal excavators.


我怎么觉得整篇都有说人们都会买duplicate的art呢?因为如果没有人买就不会数量那么多,而且那里说了这题是A呢?就是不支持买duplicate。而且倒数第二段说了 Indeed, with the help of a computer, sold artifacts could be more accessible than are the pieces stored in bulging museum basements.,C为什么不对?

沙发
发表于 2005-8-16 22:37:00 | 只看该作者

TO V22:这个好像是OG第二篇吧,OG有详细的解释的。

板凳
发表于 2005-8-17 15:27:00 | 只看该作者

第三题中谈到storage占用了display的地方,原文中没说。


第五题的C内容对,但是不符合问题的内容。问题问的是对非法挖掘的影响,但C谈的是对那些出售了的挖掘品的记录,不相干。

地板
 楼主| 发表于 2005-8-17 16:39:00 | 只看该作者

ring搜索过,但是不是这些问题。


第五题


(A) Prospective purchasers would prefer to buy authenticated artifacts,哪里说了?

5#
发表于 2005-8-17 22:18:00 | 只看该作者

5.    The author’s argument concerning the effect of the official sale of duplicate artifacts on illegal excavation is based on which of the following assumptions?


(A) Prospective purchasers would prefer to buy authenticated artifacts.


请见L51-55:


But the demand for the clandestine product would be substantially reduced. Who would want an unmarked pot when another was available whose provenance was known, and that was dated stratigraphically (stratigraphy: n.地层学, 地层中的岩石组成) by the professional archaeologist who excavated it?


结合选项A和黑体字的原文,字面理解是:“如果DUPLICATE ARTIFACTS可以公开出售的话,对于非法采掘的文物需求下降”,所以当然只能说明DUPLICATE ARTIFACTS是有市场需求的(如果没有需求,公开出售合法采掘的文物也就不会对非法文物的需求产生影响了,属于取非削弱)


举个例子,现在中国的假NIKE产品特多,如果真NIKE出现且价格合适的话,则假NIKE肯定没以前卖得好,这一现象就说明人们还是prefer 真NIKE的。:)



6#
 楼主| 发表于 2005-8-18 08:55:00 | 只看该作者

哎呀,怎么没看到But the demand for the clandestine product would be substantially reduced?


谢谢ring MM

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-8-19 10:57
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部