ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 5901|回复: 14
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD-4-22

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-3-30 20:16:00 | 只看该作者

GWD-4-22


没搜到这道题,那位大侠帮我解答下.多谢


Many managers are influenced by


         dangerous myths about pay that lead


         to counterproductive decisions about


Line         how their companies compensate


  (5)       employees.  One such myth is that


labor rates, the rate per hour paid to


workers, are identical with labor costs,


the money spent on labor in relation to


the productivity of the labor force.


(10)       This myth leads to the assumption that


a company can simply lower its labor


costs by cutting wages.  But labor


costs and labor rates are not in fact


the same:  one company could pay


(15)       its workers considerably more than


another and yet have lower labor


costs if that company’s productivity


were higher due to the talent of its


workforce, the efficiency of its work


(20)       processes, or other factors.  The


         confusion of costs with rates per-


         sists partly because labor rates are


a convenient target for managers who


want to make an impact on their com-


(25)       pany’s budgets.  Because labor rates


are highly visible, managers can easily


compare their company’s rates with


those of competitors.  Furthermore,


labor rates often appear to be a


(30)       company’s most malleable financial


variable:  cutting wages appears an


easier way to control costs than such


         options as reconfiguring work pro-


cesses or altering product design.


(35)           The myth that labor rates and labor


costs are equivalent is supported by


business journalists, who frequently


confound the two.  For example, prom-


inent business journals often remark on


(40)      the “high” cost of German labor, citing


as evidence the average amount paid


to German workers.  The myth is also


perpetuated by the compensation-


consulting industry, which has its own


(45)       incentives to keep such myths alive.


First, although some of these con-


sulting firms have recently broadened


their practices beyond the area of


compensation, their mainstay con-


(50)       tinues to be advising companies on


changing their compensation prac-


tices.  Suggesting that a company’s


performance can be improved in


some other way than by altering its


(55)       pay system may be empirically cor-


rect but contrary to the consultants’


interests.  Furthermore, changes


to the compensation system may


appear to be simpler to implement


(60)       than changes to other aspects of an


organization, so managers are more


likely to find such advice from con-


sultants palatable.  Finally, to the


extant that changes in compensation


(65)       create new problems, the consultants


will continue to have work solving the


problems that result from their advice.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Q22:


The author of the passage suggests which of the following about the advice that the consulting firms discussed in the passage customarily give to companies attempting to control costs?


                 




  • It often fails to bring about the intended changes in companies’ compensation systems.



  • It has highly influenced views that predominate in prominent business journals.



  • It tends to result in decreased labor rates but increased labor costs.



  • It leads to changes in companies’ compensation practices that are less visible than changes to work processes would be.



  • It might be different if the consulting firms were less narrowly specialized.


  • 我选E,答案是A,为什么?E那里不对呢?

    沙发
     楼主| 发表于 2005-3-30 20:21:00 | 只看该作者
    The myth is also perpetuated by the compensation-

    consulting industry, which has its own


    (45)       incentives to keep such myths alive.


    First, although some of these con-


    sulting firms have recently broadened


    their practices beyond the area of


    compensation, their mainstay con-


    (50)       tinues to be advising companies on


    changing their compensation prac-


    tices.  


    我选E是从这句话来的,可是A选项的意思在原文中的什么位置呢?

    板凳
    发表于 2005-3-31 12:39:00 | 只看该作者
    地板
     楼主| 发表于 2005-4-1 10:55:00 | 只看该作者

    多谢,可是还是没有被说服,其实觉得E也不是太好,可是A也和最后一句话说得并不完全一样啊


    Finally, to the extant that changes in compensation create new problems, the consultants


    will continue to have work solving the problems that result from their advice.


    It often fails to bring about the intended changes in companies’ compensation systems.


    我对原文的理解是,对薪酬体系的改革(变化)带来了新的问题,这说明薪酬体系确如顾问建议,进行了变化,只不过这种变化带来的结果并不令人满意。如果A选项变成it often fails to bring out the intended results in companies' compensation systems,才是文章最后一句话的内容


    要么,是不是我对intended changes 的理解有误?

    5#
     楼主| 发表于 2005-4-1 11:28:00 | 只看该作者
    又看了一遍,觉得相对而言,B和原文最一致,It has highly influenced views that predominate in prominent business journals. highly influenced views指the myth that labor rates and labor costs are equivalent
    6#
    发表于 2005-4-8 00:44:00 | 只看该作者
    but the article does not say that it is the consultants' advice that influenced what journalists thought.
    7#
    发表于 2005-4-8 07:39:00 | 只看该作者

    对于B的正确与否,我是这么考虑的。可能混淆视听,看看而已,尚不能作为最终解答



    It has highly influenced views that predominate in prominent business journals.


    首先看views that predominate in prominent business journals是什么。在文中有“The myth that labor rates and labor costs are equivalent is supported by business journalists, who frequently confound the two.  For example, prominent business journals often ....”。这样,可知 views应当指the myth.


    第二,文中进一步指出“The myth is also perpetuated by the compensation consulting industry, which has its own incentives to keep such myths alive.”由此可知The myth,即views,同时受到顾问行业的影响。


    第三,文中在此用了perpetuated,我觉得这个词确实有highly influenced的含意。


    第四,文中下面进一步说了the compensation consulting industry中the consultants' advice的影响,继而可以基本将“受到顾问行业的影响”联系为“受the consultants' advice的影响”。the consultants' advice就是选项中的it指代。


    综上,我认为选项B所述,“It has highly influenced views that predominate in prominent business journals.”为正确的。我认为,这里侧重考察我们对段落中几个关系的递进理解,多点定位,关键词汇perpetuated的意思细微差别这三方面,这还是ETS在OG中曾反映出的考察方向。


    再想想,此选项确实比较牵强。关键是对选项的准确意思把握不是很清楚。请大家多讨论讨论吧。


    [此贴子已经被作者于2005-5-9 0:58:57编辑过]
    8#
    发表于 2005-5-2 07:46:00 | 只看该作者

    首先E肯定不对, 因为文中说了"although some of these con-sulting firms have recently broadened their practices beyond the area of compensation, their mainstay con-tinues to be", 就是说即使practices变宽了还是一样.

    其次在A中,如果理解intended changes为correct changes,则A是正确的, 关键问题是通篇文章都认为不该change compensation system 而该 "reconfiguring work processes or altering product design". 所以应理解intended changes为consulting company's intended changes, 如文章最后一句"Finally, to the extant that changes in compensation create new problems," 明显表明是consulting company故意用来赚钱的changes. 故A不是答案,

    同意答案B

    9#
     楼主| 发表于 2005-5-3 17:06:00 | 只看该作者

    刚在天山里又遇到这道题,还是选错了


    First, although some of these consulting firms have recently broadened their practices beyond the area of compensation, their mainstay continues to be advising companies on changing their compensation practices.


    对这段话,还是理解有误,


    10#
    发表于 2005-5-4 23:22:00 | 只看该作者

    偶觉得,如果consultants的专业性放宽,即不那么只专注于建议公司改变薪酬体系, 仍然得不到it may be different的结果

    因为,.建议其他的contrary to the consultants' interests, 也就是说,如果有家咨询公司是多面手,在流程再造啊,提高员工效率方面很有造诣, 但因为interests使然, 再加上后面的"be simpler to implement"以及最后的"改变薪酬体系产生很多新问题,而咨询公司又可以在这些他们自己制造的问题上继续做咨询(延长咨询项目,获利"使得咨询公司不会在这个问题上有多大改变.

    这个类似逻辑里的取非

    而我认为B是一个无关的选项, 没有看出做咨询的给做文章的有什么影响

    A的话,最后一句可以说明问题,(题外话: 读完文章有这么个感觉,咨询公司不管被咨询企业什么问题,都拿一帖药来治,那很可能导致A说的结果)

    您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

    Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

    手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-9-23 23:30
    京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

    ChaseDream 论坛

    © 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

    返回顶部