ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2419|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[argument] A64求拍

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2012-1-4 21:41:24 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
64. Collectors prize the ancient life-size clay statues of human figures made on Kali Island but have long wondered how Kalinese artists were able to depict bodies with such realistic precision. Since archaeologists have recently discovered molds of human heads and hands on Kali, we can now conclude that the ancient Kalinese artists used molds of actual bodies, not sculpting tools and techniques, to create these statues. This discovery explains why Kalinese miniature statues were abstract and entirely different in style: molds could be used only for life-size sculptures. It also explains why few ancient Kalinese sculpting tools have been found. In light of this discovery, collectors predict that the life-size sculptures will decrease in value while the miniatures increase in value.
“Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide whether the prediction and the argument on which it is based are reasonable. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the prediction.”

In this edtorial, the author argues that life-size sculptures will decrease in value while the miniatures increase in value. To support the conclusion the writer points out that the reason why kalinese artists were capable to depict bodies with such realistic precision is they used molds of actual bodies, not sculpturing tools and techniques to create these statues, what’s more, there are few ancient Kalinese sculpting tools have been found. However, this argument suffers from seveal flaws and is therefore unconvincing as it stands albeit it may appear plausible at a cursory glance.
First, although the archaeologists have discovered molds of actual heads and hands on Kali but it does not necessarily indicate that the ancient Kalinese artists used molds to create these sculptures, perhaps they just made the molds for fun or they thought the molds are good works, so the editorial provides no evidence to substantiate the assumption, hence, without accounting for as well as ruling out other likely factors, the author could not assumes that the Kalinese artists used these molds to create sculptures.
Secondly, even if the Kalinese artists used the molds to create the life-size sculptures but it would not be the reason why the miniature statues wew abstract and entirely different in style,the author fails to account for the defference propose between the life-size sculpture and the miniature statues, perhaps the artists planed to use in different ways, so the so-called defferent in style and abstract does not necessarily indicate the molds thing. To corroborate his point, the author should pay a close attention, with the evidence of ruling out other likely factors could writer bolster his assumption.
Thirdly, the writer cites few ancient Kalinese sculpting tools have been found, it does not necessarily indicate that Kalinese artists used the molds to create sculptures, perhaps the tools have been eroded during different periods or the archaeologists did not find them, so the author provide no evidence to prove Kalinese artists used molds to create sculptures.
Last but not the least, the writer concludes that the life-size sculptures will decrease in value and the miniatures will increase, but the author has no evidence to substantiate people would rather like miniatures than life-size sculptures, so it makes no sense to assume that miniatures will increase in value while life-size will decrease, without compelling evidence to support, the arguer’s conclusion is not worthy of consideration.
In retropect, further investigation and analysis are needed,if the argument want to be more thorough and logically acceptable, the author should provide us more evidence such as a result of a nationwide survey about which sculpture the people like more and investgate the worth of the life-size sculptures and miniatures.
感觉写的挺糟的,特别是语言,废话多,重复的一大堆,求指教
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2012-1-5 07:28:20 | 只看该作者
结构应该组织组织。。而且没有重点。
板凳
发表于 2012-1-5 10:15:52 | 只看该作者
你可以有很多说的,但你没有出来的,因为你说的停留于表面,没有深入。
所以虽然你中间写了四段,但还显得不够分量。
另外,你的质疑的点都是好的。语言需要精炼需要提高啊。
地板
发表于 2012-1-6 01:01:17 | 只看该作者
"First, although the archaeologists have discovered molds of actual heads and hands on Kali but it does not necessarily indicate that the ancient Kalinese artists used molds to create these sculptures, perhaps they just made the molds for fun or they thought the molds are good works, so the editorial provides no evidence to substantiate the assumption, hence, without accounting for as well as ruling out other likely factors, the author could not assumes that the Kalinese artists used these molds to create sculptures."   This argument is far to shallow!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-7-23 08:20
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部