ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1327|回复: 6
打印 上一主题 下一主题

og44-266题

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-11-18 14:26:00 | 只看该作者

og44-266题

没找到有人问这个题,我就问问了。


266. Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the explanation provided by the human


capital theory for women’s concentration in certain occupations in seventeenth-century Florence?


(A)   Women were unlikely to work outside the home even in occupations whose hourse were flexible enough to allow women to accommodate domestic tasks as well as paid labor.


(B)    Parents were less likely to teach occupational skills to their daughters than they were to their sons.


(C)    Women’s participation in the Florentine paid labor force grew steadily throughout the xisteenth and seventeenth centuries.


(D)    The vast amjority of female weavers in the Florenine wool industry had children. (A)


(E)     Few women worked as weavers in the Florentine silk industry, which was devoted to making cloths that requried a high degree of skill to produce.





This question asks you to consider the effect that certain additional information would have on the


strength of an explanation provided in the passage. The correct answer choice will be the one that


would, if true, most weaken the explanation. Choice A is the best answer. The human capital


theory explanation posits that women were more likely to take jobs that could be done at home


because that allowed the women also to attend to domestic child-rearing duties. If women had


been unlikely to work outside the home even in jobs with hours flexible enough to accommodate


domestic work as well, then the need to attend to domestic tasks would not appear to be a


sufficient explanation for the high concentrations of women who opted to work at home. Choice B


is incorrect because a differential teaching of occupational skills by parents to their children


according to gender does not weaken the human capital theory explanation. Choice C is incorrect:


since women who worked at home and women who worded outside the home were all part of the


paid labor force, a growth in the female paid labor force would not necessarily weaken the human


capital theory explanation. Choice D is not correct because the explanation asserts that women


tended to choose weaving as an occupation because it allowed them to stay home and attend to


child rearing. If the vast majority of female weavers had children this would support the


explanation, not weaken it. Choice E is incorrect. If the Florentine silk industry was a high-skilled


sector of the weaving industry, the human capital theory explanation would lead you to expect few


women to be employed in that sector. Thus choice E, rather than weakening the explanation,


accords with it.


这个题的D选项为什么是support the explanation?


那个解释是说,妇女在家里工作,是因为可以看孩子之类的。D说工厂里的女工都有孩子,虽然不是直接weaken,但也不是支持吧。请NN们指教一下,谢谢!!!


[此贴子已经被作者于2005-11-18 14:28:15编辑过]
沙发
发表于 2005-11-19 00:31:00 | 只看该作者

记得文章好象是说妇女因为要照顾家里,所以才只做某种工作的.


现在D说妇女都有小孩,就是说妇女有照顾家里的需要,所以就支持了作者的观点.


而A是说就算她们工作时间灵活,工作生活两不误,她们都不干这种工作,就说明和做家务带小孩不是她们做不做工作的决定性因素.

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2005-11-19 00:40:00 | 只看该作者

such as



weaving, but not in others, such as combing or carding, by positing that because of their primary



responsibility in child rearing women took occupations that could be carried out in the home.




文章中的原话是这样的。这里的carry out in the home不是说的在家里工作么?


如果我理解没有错,那么在家里工作跟在工厂里工作是直接冲突的啊。


[此贴子已经被作者于2005-11-19 0:41:45编辑过]
地板
发表于 2005-11-19 01:05:00 | 只看该作者
文章说虽然妇女是做LOW-SKILL的工作,但是不是所有LOW-SKILL的工作妇女都做,只在一些行业里面大量妇女工作其中,比如WEAVING. by positing that because of their primary



responsibility in child rearing women took occupations that could be carried out in the home., WEAVING之所以妇女都就是因为可以在家里做, 同时带小孩.


而but not in others, such as combing or carding,就因为这些不能在家里做,要出门到工厂里去

5#
 楼主| 发表于 2005-11-19 02:27:00 | 只看该作者
The human capital


theory explanation posits that women were more likely to take jobs that could be done at home


because that allowed the women also to attend to domestic child-rearing duties.


og解释先是说妇女喜欢的工作是可以在家里做的,因为他们可以照顾孩子。D说有大量的妇女在工厂里做,那也是一种weaken吧,为什么解释D的时候说是support呢

6#
发表于 2005-11-19 07:23:00 | 只看该作者

The vast amjority of female weavers in the Florenine wool industry had children


D里面只指一种人的, 就是WEAVERS,她们虽然号称帮工厂工作, 但是不是集中在工厂里面象combing or carding, 而是接了活在家里做的,因为她们要带小孩. 所以D说她们人人都有小孩,就支持了作者的论点.


比如WEAVING. by positing that because of their primaryresponsibility in child rearing women took occupations that could be carried out in the home., WEAVING之所以妇女都就是因为可以在家里做, 同时带小孩.

7#
发表于 2007-5-26 19:17:00 | 只看该作者

能问一下为啥B不对?父母教skill的偏向不是对原文说因为妇女有孩子的打扰不能掌握skill的weaken吗?我的思路错在什么地方?

跪谢!!


[此贴子已经被作者于2007-5-26 19:17:18编辑过]
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-6-10 11:15
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部