gwd-5-q40 怎么没有人问啊

Q40: GWD-4-20

Communityactivist:  If Morganville wants to keepits central shopping district healthy, it should prevent the opening of a hugeSaveAll discount department store on the outskirts of Morganville. Records from other small towns show thatwhenever SaveAll has opened a store outside the central shopping district of asmall town, within five years the town has experienced the bankruptcies of morethan a quarter of the stores in the shopping district.

The answer to whichof the following would be most useful for evaluating the community activist’sreasoning?

A.   Have community activists in other townssuccessfully campaigned against the opening of a SaveAll store on the outskirtsof their towns?

B.   Do a large percentage of the residents ofMorganville currently do almost all of their shopping at stores in Morganville?

C.   In towns with healthy central shoppingdistricts, what proportion of the stores in those districts suffer bankruptcyduring a typical five-year period?

D.   What proportion of the employees at theSaveAll store on the outskirts of Morganville will be drawn from Morganville?

E.    Do newly opened SaveAll stores ever losemoney during their first five years of operation?

一些解释：

评价题是加强/削弱的演绎题形，回答肯定变成加强，否定变削弱

。题目分析：问的是评价，我们说过，评价就是五个人在聊原文说的那些事情，跑题了不能算评价，客观叙述原文也不能算评价，原文反复谈的就是这个地区是否要阻止一个打折店开业，因为以往经历告诉我们凡是开了这个店不到五年，会有很多店铺倒闭，我们来看选项A说的其他地区是否会阻止这个打折店开业，围绕其他地区谈，原文只围绕 Morganville这个地区谈过，这个选项跑题了。B说是否会有大量居民在 Morganville的店铺里购物，是否有大量居民购物原文没有涉及到过，也跑题了。C说我们要看看一些健康的地区，有多少店铺在五年之内倒闭了，原文反复谈的就是这个打折店开业是否会导致其他店铺倒闭，此选项没有跑题，留着。D说开的这个打折店有多少员工来自 Morganville?说的是员工来源问题，跑题了，排除。E说这个新开的打折店是否会在头五年亏损，原文没有说过是否亏损，跑题，杀。

关键理解什麽是EVALUATION题。EVALUATION题是WEAKEN和SUPPORT的结合，对选项的YES和NO或两个极端的回答能对原文的结论起WEAKEN和SUPPORT的作用。注意：不是YES就一定要起WEAKEN或SUPPORT作用，而是一个起WEAKEN作用，另一个就起SUPPORT作用，反之亦然。即不同的回答能起不同的作用。

对本题，两个极端的回答是0%和100%。如果正常破产率为0%，则支持原文结论（开折扣店有害），如果是100%破产率，则削弱原文（开折扣店没有害，1/4破产率不算高）。故起EVALUATION的作用。 lawyer